ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Assessing HIV-1 subtype C infection dynamics, therapeutic responses and reservoir distribution using a humanized mouse model.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: While HIV-1 subtype C (HIV-1C) is the most prevalent and widely distributed subtype in the HIV pandemic, nearly all current prevention and therapeutic strategies are based on work with the subtype B (HIV-1B). HIV-1C displays distinct genetic and pathogenic features from that of HIV-1B. Thus, treatment approaches developed for HIV-1B need to be suitably optimized for HIV-1C. A suitable animal model will help delineate comparative aspects of HIV-1C and HIV-1B infections. Methods: Here, we used a humanized mouse model to evaluate HIV-1C infection, disease progression, response to anti-retroviral therapy (ART) and viral rebound following therapy interruption. A limited comparative study with a prototypical subtype B virus was also performed. Viral infection, immune cell dynamics, acquisition of anti-retroviral therapy (ART) resistance and anatomical reservoir distribution following extended and interrupted therapy were compared. Results: In comparison, lower early plasma viremia was observed with HIV-1C, but with similar rate of CD4+ T cell depletion as that of HIV-1B. Viral suppression by ART was delayed in the HIV-1C infected group with evidence, in one case, of acquired class wide resistance to integrase inhibitors, a critical component of current global therapy regimens. Also, HIV-1C infected animals displayed faster rebound viremia following ART interruption (ATI). Disparate patterns of tissue proviral DNA distribution were observed following extended ART and ATI suggestive of distinct sources of viral rebound. Discussion: In this preliminary study, discernible differences were noted between HIV-1C and B with implications for prevention, therapeutics and curative strategies. Results from here also highlight the utility of the hu-HSC mouse model for future expanded studies in this context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.