ReviewFrontiers in physiology2025
Conceptualizing myocardial contractility as an emergent property that characterizes myocardial contraction.
Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myocardial contractility (MC) is a fundamental concept that is widely used to describe the cardiac muscles' mechanical function, yet its definitions in textbooks and literature are vague, inconsistent, and often contradictory. In this article, we categorize these many issues into five groups and conducts a conceptual analysis to redefine MC from a broader, more comprehensive perspective. We propose a functional, three-domain framework of MC consisting of capacity/resource, adaptability, and ability (force (F) and/or velocity (V) generated during muscle contraction), emphasizing the dynamic, non-linear interactions among the three domains and their clinical significance. Specifically, we highlight how interventions targeting MC may produce non-linear effects, suggesting a shift toward optimizing resource use rather than maximizing outputs (i.e., F and/or V of myocardial contraction, the outputs of the ability domain), which could potentially reduce the complications of positive inotropic interventions. We also discuss the implications of several new conceptual developments as the byproducts of the three-domain MC framework. Additionally, we identify system-level emergent properties of MC briefly, including contraction efficiency, circadian rhythm-dependence, temperature-dependence, and history-dependence, with implications for cardiac muscle research, exercise training, and clinical decision-making. The three-domain functional framework of MC resolves the inconsistencies in definitions, differentiates MC from cardiac performance, and offers a structured perspective for facilitating both experimental studies and therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.