ReviewFrontiers in network physiology2025
Multivariate linear time-series modeling and prediction of cerebral physiologic signals: review of statistical models and implications for human signal analytics.
Review in Frontiers in network physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpolation and Imputation Strategies for Missing Segments in Continuous Pressure-Flow Cerebral Bio-Signals: A Systematic Scoping Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Constrained Disorder Principle: A Paradigm Shift for Accurate Interactome Mapping and Information Analysis in Complex Biological Systems.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Quantifying coupling and causality in dynamic bivariate systems: a unified framework for time-domain, spectral, and information-theoretic analysis.Frontiers in network physiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cerebral physiological signals embody complex neural, vascular, and metabolic processes that provide valuable insight into the brain's dynamic nature. Profound comprehension and analysis of these signals are essential for unraveling cerebral intricacies, enabling precise identification of patterns and anomalies. Therefore, the advancement of computational models in cerebral physiology is pivotal for exploring the links between measurable signals and underlying physiological states. This review provides a detailed explanation of computational models, including their mathematical formulations, and discusses their relevance to the analysis of cerebral physiology dynamics. It emphasizes the importance of linear multivariate statistical models, particularly autoregressive (AR) models and the Kalman filter, in time series modeling and prediction of cerebral processes. The review focuses on the analysis and operational principles of multivariate statistical models such as AR models and the Kalman filter. These models are examined for their ability to capture intricate relationships among cerebral parameters, offering a holistic representation of brain function. The use of multivariate statistical models enables the capturing of complex relationships among cerebral physiological signals. These models provide valuable insights into the dynamic nature of the brain by representing intricate neural, vascular, and metabolic processes. The review highlights the clinical implications of using computational models to understand cerebral physiology, while also acknowledging the inherent limitations, including the need for stationary data, challenges with high dimensionality, computational complexity, and limited forecasting horizons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.