Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40308554›Full record

ArticleVideo journal of sports medicine

rTSA With Humeral Head Autograft Glenoid Reconstruction.

Soheil Sabzevari, Ryan Eads, Shaquille Charles, Rajiv P Reddy, Albert Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Video journal of sports medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Soheil SabzevariDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Ryan EadsDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Sports Medicine, Aptiva Health, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.
Shaquille CharlesDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1285-0224
Rajiv P ReddyDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Albert LinShoulder Service, Pittsburgh Shoulder Institute, Division of Shoulder Surgery and Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, University of Pittsburgh/University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Untreated chronic massive rotator cuff tears and primary osteoarthritis can lead to conditions of significant retroversion, posterior bone loss, and humeral head subluxation. Indications: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with humeral head autograft glenoid reconstruction may be indicated in patients with advanced glenohumeral osteoarthritis and/or severe glenoid retroversion/bone loss due to rotator cuff arthropathy, trauma, primary, or inflammatory osteoarthritis. Technique: Besides routine radiography and preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans, 3-dimensional (3D) planning software is often performed as a routine part of preoperative planning. A 3D printed model of the glenoid can also be helpful in cases of significant bone deformity. Patients are placed in a 45° modified beach chair position. Using a standard deltopectoral approach, the glenoid is exposed. An anatomic humeral head resection is made. The contour of the articular margin of the humeral head should match the glenoid bone deficiency anatomically as it has been chronically resting within the glenoid defect. Three dimensional preoperative planning and the 3D printed model are used to make an asymmetric humeral head autograft which should match the deficiency perfectly. The articular cartilage is removed with a burr. The graft and baseplate are coupled together (metaphyseal bone facing the baseplate and prepared articular side of the graft facing native bone) and measurements are performed with the preoperative planning software to fashion a graft with the appropriate dimension and with the desired amount of lateralization. The bone graft is then compressed with the baseplate to the native glenoid and fixed with screws. Results: In select patients with careful preoperative planning, excellent outcomes can be achieved with careful gradual resumption of range of motion and strength with physical therapy. Sequential radiographic imaging is performed up to 6 months and beyond to confirm solid union of graft to native glenoid bone and incorporation into the baseplate. Discussion/Conclusion: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) with humeral head autograft glenoid reconstruction is an excellent option to address severe glenoid bone loss and restore the native joint line for both primary osteoarthritis and rotator cuff arthropathy. Using 3D CT scans, 3D preoperative planning software and 3D printing of the glenoid can help achieve a good outcome. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Indexed as

glenoid bone defecthumeral head autograftreverse total shoulder arthroplastyrTSA

Identifiers

PMID40308554
PMCPMC11931229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.