Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40308525›Full record

ArticleVideo journal of sports medicine

Humeral Head Reconstruction of Reverse Hill-Sachs Lesions With Osteochondral Allograft.

Kyle T Deivert, Jelle P van der List, Nicholas A Trasolini, Brian R Waterman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Video journal of sports medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kyle T DeivertAtrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Department of Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Jelle P van der ListAtrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Department of Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Nicholas A TrasoliniAtrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Department of Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9458-8623
Brian R WatermanAtrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Department of Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: True confirmed posterior shoulder dislocations are relatively uncommon injuries, with an estimated incidence of 1.1 per 100,000 individuals and are initially missed in up to 50% to 80% of cases. There are several treatment options for this injury presentation. In this case, we will focus on reconstruction with osteochondral allograft. Indications: If the cartilage cannot be fixed due to comminution or the cartilage is not viable due to chronicity or impact, osteochondral allograft might be a treatment option. This technique is typically considered for defects involving greater than 35% to 40% of the humeral head. Technique Description: The anterior defect on the humeral head was exposed on the cadaver specimen. Circular bone plugs were obtained from a distal femur specimen for grafting. Graft sites were prepared with a 15 reamer with an orthogonal approach to avoid oblique entry for a stacked bone plug configuration. Bone plug grafts were placed in the defect via press-fit fixation. The subscapularis is repaired to the lesser tubercle following the reconstruction. Results: Various studies reported improvement in pain, shoulder range of motion, and patient-reported outcome scores. A small percentage of patients developed allograft necrosis. Patients who received autografts had lower rates of osteoarthritis than patients who received allograft. Rehab protocol can last up to 12 months and begins with restricted range of motions and slowly advancing to isometric movements and gradually increasing range of motion and strengthening. Discussion/Conclusion: Outcomes described in previous studies are limited due to the low incidence of these injuries and small sample size. Missing the initial posterior dislocation as this is often correlated with inferior outcomes when treated in chronic setting. There is a risk of damage to humeral articular cartilage during osteochondral tissue harvesting so care must be taken during tissue harvest. Older, lower-demand patients have been reported to do well with nonoperative treatment, even in the case of a chronic dislocation, so careful discussion with the patient is needed to not perform surgery in a reasonably functioning non-painful shoulder. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Indexed as

allograftHill-Sachshumerusosteochondralreconstructionshoulder

Identifiers

PMID40308525
PMCPMC11956877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.