Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40308493›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025

Algorithm-based analysis of lymph node dissection strategies and survival outcomes in primary oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Andreas Vollmer, Babak Saravi, Alexander Kübler, Urs Müller-Richter, Anna Winter, Simon Nagler, Marius Hörner, Sebastian Gubik, Stefan Hartmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Andreas Vollmer *Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Plastic Surgery, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Babak Saravi *Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Alexander KüblerDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Plastic Surgery, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Urs Müller-RichterDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Plastic Surgery, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Anna WinterDepartment of Prosthodontics, Julius Maximilian University Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Simon NaglerDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Plastic Surgery, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Marius HörnerDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Plastic Surgery, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Sebastian GubikDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Plastic Surgery, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Stefan HartmannDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Plastic Surgery, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Recent advancements in treatment approaches for oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCCs) necessitate a reevaluation of neck dissection techniques and their impact on patient outcomes and morbidity. Methods: This retrospective study of 250 OSCC patients recruited between 2017-2022 examined the association between neck dissection techniques and survival metrics. Our cohort, drawn from a primary OSCC surgery population at our clinic, provided a rich dataset encompassing demographics, clinical parameters, and detailed surgical records. Two neck dissection techniques were analyzed: the Supraomohyoid Selective Neck Dissection (SND), which targets lymph nodes at Levels I-III, and Other Dissections (OD), which involve a more extensive extraction including Levels IV and V. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards models assessed the influence of lymph node dissection on postoperative outcomes. Results: Findings indicated that each additional lymph node removed was associated with a 0.289-day increase in hospitalization (p = 0.002), yet no significant link was found between dissection techniques or total lymph node extraction count and survival metrics. Levels I to III emerged as critical areas with the highest likelihood of yielding tumor-positive lymph nodes, emphasizing the significance of these levels. Discussion: The study suggests that more extensive dissection does not necessarily confer survival benefits, highlighting the importance of strategic surgical focus and the potential for tailored interventions that prioritize disease-specific lymph node levels to optimize patient recovery and prognosis.

Indexed as

head and neck neoplasmsKaplan-Meier estimatelymph node yieldneck dissectionproportional hazards modelsurvival rate

Identifiers

PMID40308493
PMCPMC12041001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.