Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40308443›Full record

ArticleVideo journal of sports medicine

Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis: The "Over-the-Top" Technique.

Stefano Zaffagnini, Alberto Grassi, Gian Andrea Lucidi, Giacomo Dal Fabbro, Luca Ambrosini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Video journal of sports medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stefano ZaffagniniII Clinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italia.
Alberto GrassiII Clinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italia.
Gian Andrea LucidiII Clinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italia.
Giacomo Dal FabbroII Clinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italia.
Luca AmbrosiniII Clinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is a primary restraint to anteroposterior as well as rotatory knee laxity. In case of concomitant lesion of menisci or other ligamentous structures, further dynamic instability is encountered. A lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) augmentation has been proposed by the Authors to treat or prevent residual laxity. Indications: ACL reconstruction is recommended in young athletes involved in pivoting sports, non-contact pivoting injuries, high-grade pivot shift, deep notch sign and double bone bruise, meniscal loss, and revision of previous bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft. Technique Description: A 2 to 3 cm oblique incision is made over the pes anserinus. Gracilis and semitendinosus tendons are harvested with their attachment preserved and sutured together. Tibial tunnel is reamed after positioning of a guide pin. A wire-loop passer is directed from the tibial tunnel to the anteromedial portal. A 2 to 3 cm longitudinal incision is made superior-laterally, the ileotibial band is divided and retracted anteriorly. A suture-loop is retrieved from the lateral incision through the anteromedial portal with a curved Kelly clamp. The suture is placed into the wire-loop and retrieved with it from the tibial tunnel. The graft is retrieved from the lateral incision, tensioned with the knee at 70° to 90° of flexion and foot in neutral rotation and secured with 2 staples to the femur. A 1-cm skin incision is performed just below the Gerdy tubercle. The graft is retrieved from this incision below the fascia with a small Kelly clamp, tensioned and secured with a staple. The iliotibial tract defect is closed. Results: At long-term follow-up, a revision rate of 3% has been reported, while patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were excellent. At very-long-term follow-up, most patients were still involved in sports with a very low rate of positive Lachman and pivot shift tests. No overconstraint and lateral osteoarthritis were encountered. Medial osteoarthritis was related only to medial meniscectomy. Discussion/Conclusion: The ACL reconstruction plus LET over-the-top technique is a safe and reliable surgery with a low rate of reoperations and peri-operative complications at very-long-term follow-up. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Indexed as

ACL-Ranterior cruciate ligament reconstructionarthroscopyhamstringslateral extra-articular reconstructionLETOTTover-the-top

Identifiers

PMID40308443
PMCPMC11962631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.