Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40308366›Full record

ArticleWomen's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)2025

Acceptability of Vaginal Human Papillomavirus Self-Collection Among Colposcopy Clinic Attendees.

Kathy L MacLaughlin, Kristin C Cole, Julie A Maxson, Jainnee McCann, Xuan Zhu, Robert M Jacobson, Matthew R Meunier, Margaret E Long

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kathy L MacLaughlinDepartment of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Kristin C ColeDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Julie A MaxsonDepartment of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Jainnee McCannDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Xuan ZhuKern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Robert M JacobsonDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Matthew R MeunierDepartment of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8480-4984
Margaret E LongDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cervical cancer screening with a self-collected vaginal specimen for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in May 2024, offering a potential solution to declining screening rates. Objective: We aimed to assess acceptability of clinic-based vaginal specimen self-collection for HPV testing and to evaluate associations between participants' sociodemographics and their likelihood of choosing self-collection for future screening and the overall acceptability of using the Evalyn® brush device. We also evaluated associations between specific acceptability constructs and reported likelihood to use the device in the future and overall acceptability. Methods: Following self-collection of a vaginal specimen, participants completed an electronic survey that measured constructs from the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. Associations were assessed using logistic regressions. The study was conducted at a colposcopy clinic in the Gynecology department of a midwestern academic medical center in the United States from November 2022 through July 2023. Results: Participants ( Conclusion: Vaginal specimen self-collection for HPV testing was well-received in the studied population, with high acceptability and likelihood of uptake. Implementation efforts should provide user-friendly instructions and emphasize the benefits of self-collection for cervical cancer screening, particularly among people less likely to engage with clinician-collected speculum-based screening.

Indexed as

early detection of cancerhuman papillomavirus DNA testspatient preferenceuterine cervical neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID40308366
PMCPMC12040563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.