Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40308356›Full record

ArticleWomen's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)2025

Motivations and Preferences for Self-Sampled Human Papillomavirus Testing Among Average-and High-Risk Patients: An Exploratory Analysis.

Rebecca Morgis, Ashley Wong, Lisa M Witmer, Anne Kantner, Megan Mendez-Miller, Sarah I Ramirez, Mack T Ruffin, Jennifer L Moss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rebecca MorgisPenn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.
Ashley WongPenn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.
Lisa M WitmerPenn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.
Anne KantnerPenn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.
Megan Mendez-MillerPenn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.
Sarah I RamirezPenn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.
Mack T RuffinPenn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jennifer L MossPenn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Cervical cancer screening rates fall below national goals. At-home self-sampled tests for human papillomavirus (HPV) may improve screening rates. This study assesses the acceptability of self-sampled HPV testing with respect to motivating factors and preference among average-risk patients (undergoing routine screening) and high-risk patients (receiving follow-up care after abnormal screening results). Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study sample consisted of 46 participants (female, ages 30-65), including average-risk (n = 35) and high-risk (n = 11) patients, who had already received clinician-collected cervical cancer screening. Participants completed a self-sampled HPV test and a survey. Motivators included cervical cancer screening facilitators, sexual history, health care factors, and feelings during self-sampled test. We analyzed the relationships between these constructs and test modality preference for their next cervical cancer screening (i.e., self-sampled HPV testing at home vs. other preference). Results: Few participants experienced negative feelings during self-sampled HPV testing (uncomfortable: 20%; anxious: 22%; and unpleasant: 15%). Overall, 57% of participants would prefer to complete a self-sampled HPV test at home for their next cervical cancer screening compared with other test options. Test modality preference for their next cervical cancer screening did not differ for average- versus high-risk patients, and it did not vary by any of the motivating factors we assessed (all Conclusions: Acceptability of self-sampled HPV testing at home is high, with little difference in attitudes observed across patient characteristics. These findings demonstrate that self-sampled HPV testing may be an effective tool for increasing cervical cancer screening, even among high-risk patients who have previously had abnormal screening results.

Indexed as

cancer screeningcervical cancerhuman papillomavirus (HPV)self-sample

Identifiers

PMID40308356
PMCPMC12040559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.