Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40308341›Full record

ArticleVideo journal of sports medicine

Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis as an Adjunct to ACL Reconstruction.

Madeline M McGovern, Sercan Yalcin, Natalie A Lowenstein, Jillian L Mazzocca, Elizabeth G Matzkin, Giovanna Medina

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Video journal of sports medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Madeline M McGovernMass General Brigham, Department of Orthopaedics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Sercan YalcinMass General Brigham, Department of Orthopaedics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1310-068X
Natalie A LowensteinMass General Brigham, Department of Orthopaedics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Jillian L MazzoccaMass General Brigham, Department of Orthopaedics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Elizabeth G MatzkinMass General Brigham, Department of Orthopaedics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Giovanna MedinaMass General Brigham, Department of Orthopaedics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) is a surgical technique used to decrease the risk of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) failure by supplementing internal rotational stability and reducing pivot shift. Indications: A growing body of literature indicates that LET should be performed for patients under 25 years, those with increased posterior tibial slope and ligamentous laxity, and elite athletes in cutting and/or pivoting sports. Additional indications include patients with grade 2 pivot shift or greater and those with a history of anterior cruciate ligament graft failure. Technique Description: Surgeon preference determines LET and ACLR sequence. Anatomic landmarks are identified and marked. A 5-cm incision is made in line with the iliotibial (IT) band from Gerdy's tubercle toward the lateral epicondyle. Dissection is carried to the IT band. Approximately 1 cm from the posterior border of the IT band, a full-thickness graft of 7 to 8 cm in length and 1 cm in width is harvested proximally and then whipstitched. A varus stress applies ligamentous tension and aids in lateral collateral ligament (LCL) identification. The LCL is dissected out, and the graft is passed underneath it. An all-suture anchor placed approximately 1 to 2 cm proximal and posterior to the lateral epicondyle and the knee is positioned in neutral rotation and at approximately 60° of flexion. The graft is passed inside the suture loop with an additional knot tied over the top using the needled suture. The IT band is then repaired side to side. Remaining subcutaneous tissue and skin are closed in standard fashion based on the order of the surgery. Results: In the STABILITY randomized controlled trial, 2-year outcomes demonstrated a clinically and statistically significant decrease in clinical failure from 40% to 25% and graft rupture rate from 11% to 4% with the addition of LET to ACLR with hamstring autograft. Similar return-to-sport rate was seen between cohorts. A meta-analysis of 6 studies examining ACLR versus ACLR + LET in individuals undergoing primary ACLR reported a reduced incidence of graft failure and postoperative anterolateral rotatory instability. Discussion/Conclusion: LET is a technique that can help reduce the risk of ACLR failure. Our technique employs a knotless suture anchor to confer anterolateral rotatory stability in the setting of ACLR. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Indexed as

ACL reconstructionanterolateral stabilitylateral extra-articular tenodesisLETpivot shift

Identifiers

PMID40308341
PMCPMC11956870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.