Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40308317›Full record

ArticleVideo journal of sports medicine

Knee Multiligament Reconstruction: ACL / PCL / MCL.

Courtney Quinn, Anthony J Ignozzi, Eric Taleghani, Mark Miller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Video journal of sports medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Courtney QuinnDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1657-7384
Anthony J IgnozziDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Eric TaleghaniDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Mark MillerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Multiligament knee injury (MLKI) is a rare, complex injury that requires surgical intervention. However, there is a lack of consensus regarding optimal timing, staging, and graft choice for ligament reconstruction. Indications: Delayed, single-stage reconstruction offers the advantage of attaining improved preoperative range of motion and potential healing of extra-articular ligaments and may be necessary in the setting of multitrauma. Technique Description: A hamstring graft was harvested and diagnostic arthroscopy performed. Three posterior portals were made for posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction. Femoral and tibial pins were placed for both PCL and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tunnels, positions confirmed with fluoroscopy, and tunnels drilled over the pins. The Achilles allograft was shuttled through the femoral and tibial PCL tunnels in anterograde fashion and fixed with a metal interference screw on the femoral side. The hamstring autograft was passed through the ACL tunnels and suspended on the femoral side. Tibial fixation of both grafts was achieved with biocomposite interference. Medial collateral ligament reconstruction was performed through the medial incision from hamstring harvesting. The semitendinosis allograft was passed and fixed with screws and spiked washers. Fluoroscopy confirmed that screw trajectory did not interfere with the ACL or PCL tunnels. Results: Bagherifard et al reported a study of 41 consecutive patients with MLKI who underwent single-stage reconstruction with autograft and/or allograft. Mean postoperative Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores were 86.9 and 70, respectively, and only 7 patients experienced restricted range of motion. Billieres et al reported a study of 23 patients with MLKIs who underwent single-stage reconstruction with allograft only. Mean postoperative Lysholm and IKDC scores were 77.3 and 67.2, respectively, and 19 patients returned to sport. Goyal et al reported a study of 27 patients with MLKI who underwent single-stage reconstruction greater than 6 weeks after injury. At 2 years, there were significant improvements in Visual Analog Scale, IKDC, and Lysholm scores, and no patients had residual laxity of the knee joint. Discussion/Conclusion: Single-stage reconstruction of MLKIs is an effective intervention that has been supported in literature; however, further studies are necessary to determine optimal surgical timing and graft type.The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Indexed as

anterior cruciate ligamentlateral collateral ligamentmedial collateral ligamentmultiligament knee injuriesmultiligament reconstructionposterior cruciate ligament

Identifiers

PMID40308317
PMCPMC11924079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.