ArticleBiomedicine hub
Patient Characteristics Are Associated with Appointment "No-Show" at a Tertiary Academic Glaucoma Service: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Biomedicine hub. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma among Black and Latinx Populations: Exploring Racial Disparities in the United States.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026Review
- Characteristics Associated with Appointment No-Show at an Academic Uveitis Service.Ocular immunology and inflammation · 2026Article
- Risk Factors and Consequences of Lapses in Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Care in a National Cohort.Diabetes care · 2025Article
- Loss to Follow-up and Risk of Incident Blindness among Patients with Glaucoma in the IRIS® Registry.Ophthalmology. GlaucomaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Appointment "no-shows" (NS) are a significant issue for glaucoma patients, potentially leading to loss to follow-up, disease progression, and irreversible vision loss. This study investigates sociodemographic and clinical risk factors associated with NS at a tertiary academic eye center. Methods: A retrospective review of 100 glaucoma patients at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) Vision Institute over 1 year was conducted. Patients were categorized as NS if they missed any glaucoma service appointment and as never no-show (NNS) if no appointments were missed. Baseline demographic, medical, and ophthalmic data were collected. Socioeconomic disadvantage was measured using the area deprivation index (ADI) based on residential ZIP codes. Results: Of 100 patients, 35 were classified as NS and 65 as NNS. NS patients had significantly higher ADI scores (79 vs. 65; Conclusion: Higher socioeconomic disadvantage, Black race, medical comorbidities, and mental health diagnoses were associated with appointment NS among glaucoma patients. These findings highlight the need for targeted interventions to address these risk factors, improve follow-up adherence, and reduce the risk of disease progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.