ArticleVideo journal of sports medicine
Single-Stage Arthroscopic Cartilage Repair With Gel Scaffold and BMAC.
Article in Video journal of sports medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Injectable scaffold augmentation has been gaining traction as a promising modality for single-stage cartilage repair. It involves the use of a biological scaffold that augments microfracture techniques by aiding in clot stabilization and maturation. The scaffold provides a matrix that helps with mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) retention and encourages differentiation along a chondrogenic lineage. Bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) has also been proposed as an alternative source of MSCs to microfracture, and it can potentially avoid the pitfalls of microfracture techniques. Indications: Injectable scaffold augmentation to microfracture techniques are recommended in lesions >4 cm, as long-term follow-up has shown increasing failure over time with microfracture alone. Technique Description: We describe a technique of autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis using CartiFill, a porcine-derived type 1 collagen scaffold, combined with BMAC as a source of MSCs (avoiding the use of microfracture). Results: Injectable scaffold augmentation has been shown in recent studies to lead to better radiological fill, higher quality of histological repair, and better clinical outcomes as compared with microfracture alone. These injectable scaffolds have the versatility to be used on lesions which have traditionally been considered difficult to address, such as vertical or inverted lesions. Moreover, the use of scaffolds allows the repair to be further augmented with BMAC which provides a source of MSCs without the need to perform microfracture and perforate the subchondral bone. Discussion/Conclusion: Scaffold augmentation is a promising technique that improves upon the results of conventional microfracture repair by allowing augmentation with BMAC, as well as giving surgeons the versatility to apply the scaffold on vertical/inverted lesions. BMAC is also a viable alternative source of MSCs for cartilage repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.