ArticleJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions2025
Safety and Feasibility of the RevCore Catheter for Venous In-Stent Thrombosis: A Multicenter, Retrospective Study.
Article in Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodal Thrombectomy for Complex Venous Occlusions and In-Stent Thrombosis.JACC. Case reports · 2026Article
- Radiofrequency wire-assisted recanalization of chronic venous stent occlusions.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2026Article
- Portomesenteric Venous Mechanical Thrombectomy Using RevCore Thrombectomy Catheter.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Article
- Tackling Venous Stent Occlusions: Another Tool in the Box.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: After venous stent placement, patients may develop in-stent thrombosis (IST). The RevCore thrombectomy catheter (Inari Medical) is a novel device specifically designed to treat venous IST. Herein, the safety and feasibility of this device are evaluated. Methods: Patients were retrospectively included if they were ≥18 years old, had lower extremity venous IST, and were treated using the study device. The primary end point is technical success, defined as an average postprocedural effective diameter ≥50% and calculated using stent diameter and flow channel diameter on intravascular ultrasound. The safety end points are 30-day device-related serious adverse events, namely mortality, readmission, clinically significant pulmonary embolism, and vessel perforation. Results: Data from 44 patients (48 treated limbs, 6 treated stent types) from 4 centers were analyzed. Mean age was 54.8 ± 17.1 years, and 23 (52.3%) patients were female. Median IST symptom duration was 8.0 (IQR, 2.0-104.0) weeks. The primary end point was achieved in all 48 limbs. Comparing baseline with postprocedural measurements, effective stent diameter increased from 21.1% ± 26.5% to 89.6% ± 10.1%. No patient met a safety end point. On the first follow-up at 40.0 (29.0-62.5) days, primary patency was demonstrated in 32 (94.1%) of the 34 treated limbs with available data. Six (85.7%) limbs with Clinical-Etiology-Anatomy-Pathophysiology scores of C Conclusions: A thrombectomy procedure for deep-vein IST reestablished patency in all cases and across multiple stent types. Patency was sustained through the first follow-up in 94% of limbs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.