Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40308217›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neurology2025

Research progress in Pusher Syndrome after stroke.

Huayong Wu, Haoyang Duan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Huayong WuCollege of Sports Science and Health, Harbin Sport University, Harbin, China.
Haoyang DuanDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post-stroke Pusher Syndrome is a postural control disorder. It is characterized by active tilting toward the hemiplegic side and resistance to correction. This significantly impacts patients' motor function and quality of life. Its incidence varies greatly due to different research designs and assessment criteria. Literature reports an incidence ranging from 5% to 63%, and the incidence in patients with right brain damage (17.4%) is much higher than that in patients with left brain damage (9.5%). Etiological studies indicate that damage to the parietal lobe, thalamus, insula, and postcentral gyrus is the main pathological basis. The key mechanism is the interruption of thalamocortical connections. Typical clinical manifestations include trunk tilting in supine position, asymmetric weight-bearing in sitting, weight shift in standing, and impaired weight transfer during gait. Patients often have unilateral spatial neglect, which exacerbates balance disorders. Prognosis shows about 90% of patients recover within 6 months, but 10% to 15% may have long-term symptoms. Early rehabilitation intervention can significantly improve functional outcomes. This article comprehensively reviews the nomenclature, incidence, etiology, lesion sites, clinical manifestations, and prognosis of Pusher Syndrome, providing a research foundation for future studies on post-stroke Pusher Syndrome.

Indexed as

Pusher Syndromerehabilitationresearch progressreviewstroke

Identifiers

PMID40308217
PMCPMC12040677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.