ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2025
Fishy culture in a changing world.
Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Strategies for integrating animal social learning and culture into conservation translocation practice.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Review
- Cultural processes and demography: implications for conservation and beyond.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Article
- Integrating cultural dimensions in sperm whale (Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Review
- Animal culture: conservation in a changing world.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Animal cultures have been recognized by researchers since the mid-twentieth century, with research interest growing over the past few decades. Recently, we have realized that animal cultures have important ecological consequences, shaping mating preferences, adaptation to urban environments and the persistence of migration routes. The study of culture therefore transcends traditional, curiosity-driven research; it has real-world conservation relevance. This review centres on culture in fishes and its intersection with conservation. Culture depends upon social learning, and a large literature establishes that fishes exhibit social learning in a diverse range of contexts. Moreover, laboratory experiments demonstrate a capacity for culture in fishes, while studies of wild populations provide evidence of natural cultures, specifically the maintenance of traditional migration routes in some reef fishes. Here, we argue that such cultures are likely more widespread but overlooked and should be the target of wider research interest and conservation effort. We also argue that there is greater scope to leverage findings from laboratory studies of fish cultural transmission to better equip reintroduced fish stocks with behaviours that might enhance post-release survival. Fish cultures warrant investigation in their own right and have the potential to inform how we understand and conserve animal cultures more widely.This article is part of the theme issue 'Animal culture: conservation in a changing world'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.