Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40308143›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2025

The flexibility of social learning and its conservation implications in mammals and beyond.

Josh J Arbon, Neeltje J Boogert, Neil R Jordan, Alex Thornton

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Social learning and culture in birds: emerging patterns and relevance to conservation.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Animal culture: conservation in a changing world.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  7. Strategies for integrating animal social learning and culture into conservation translocation practice.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Josh J ArbonSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS81TQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8509-4362
Neeltje J BoogertCentre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn, Cornwall TR109FE, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1337-4365
Neil R JordanCentre for Ecosystem Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales 2052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0712-8301
Alex ThorntonCentre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn, Cornwall TR109FE, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1607-2047

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conservation strategies seek to ensure that populations persist and are resilient to environmental change. As learning from others can shape the development of skills that help animals survive, reproduce and respond to changing conditions, understanding social learning can be of crucial conservation importance. Research on mammals, with their great diversity of niches and social systems, provides vital evidence that social learning helps animals to communicate, secure mates, avoid predators, forage effectively and navigate through their ecological and social environments. However, these environments are being rapidly altered in the Anthropocene, influencing individuals' reliance on social learning, the value of learned information, its spread through groups and the stability of socially learned traditions. Here, we review and synthesize this growing body of literature to highlight how understanding the ways in which animals use social learning and deploy it flexibly throughout their lives may enhance conservation programmes. We consider both the potential negative consequences of social learning and the scope for social-learning-driven interventions to generate adaptive responses to the challenges of rapidly changing environments. A greater appreciation and integration of social learning and its flexibility will ultimately promote the effective conservation of mammals and other taxa in our fast-changing world.This article is part of the theme issue 'Animal culture: conservation in a changing world'.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesMammalsSocial LearningAnimalsconservationcultureflexibilitymammalsocial learning

Identifiers

PMID40308143
PMCPMC12044389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.