Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40308141›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2025

Strategies for integrating animal social learning and culture into conservation translocation practice.

Alison L Greggor, Shermin de Silva, Culum Brown, Brett R Jesmer, Daniel W A Noble, Thomas Mueller, Carlos R Ruiz-Miranda, Christian Rutz, Sarah Elizabeth Scott, James Williams

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Strategies for integrating animal social learning and culture into conservation translocation practice.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Cultural processes and demography: implications for conservation and beyond.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Culture and conservation in baleen whales.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  7. Animal culture: conservation in a changing world.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. The growing methodological toolkit for identifying and studying social learning and culture in non-human animals.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  9. Social learning and culture in birds: emerging patterns and relevance to conservation.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  10. Fishy culture in a changing world.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  11. Integrating space, time, and culture in animal conservation practice.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alison L GreggorConservation Science Wildlife Health, San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance, Escondido, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0998-618X
Shermin de SilvaEcology Behavior and Evolution, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5804-213X
Culum BrownSchool of Natural Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0210-1820
Brett R JesmerDepartment of Fish and Wildlife Conservation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2868-7161
Daniel W A NobleDivision of Ecology and Evolution, Research School of Biology, ANU College of Science and Medicine, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9460-8743
Thomas MuellerSenckenberg Gesellschaft fur Naturforschung, Frankfurt am Main, Hessen, Germany.
Carlos R Ruiz-MirandaLaboratório de Ciências Ambientais, Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro, Campos Dos Goytacazes, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7360-0304
Christian RutzCentre for Biological Diversity, School of Biology, University of St Andrews, Scotland UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5187-7417
Sarah Elizabeth ScottJoint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough, Cambridgeshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7165-6072
James WilliamsJoint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough, Cambridgeshire, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conservation translocations are increasingly used in species' recovery. Their success often depends upon maintaining or restoring survival-relevant behaviour, which is socially learned in many animals. A lack of species- or population-appropriate learning can lead to the loss of adaptive behaviour, increasing the likelihood of negative human interactions and compromising animals' ability to migrate, exploit resources, avoid predators, integrate into wild populations, reproduce and survive. When applied well, behavioural tools can address deficiencies in socially learned behaviours and boost survival. However, their use has been uneven between species and translocation programmes, and behaviour commonly contributes to translocation failure. Critically, current international guidance (e.g. the International Union for Conservation of Nature's translocation guidelines) does not directly discuss social learning or its facilitation. We argue that linking knowledge about social learning to appropriate translocation strategies will enhance guidance and direct future research. We offer a framework for incorporating animal social learning into translocation planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation across wild and captive settings. Our recommendations consider barriers practitioners face in contending with logistics, time constraints and intervention cost. We emphasize that stronger links between researchers, translocation practitioners and wildlife agencies would increase support for social learning research, and improve the perceived relevance and feasibility of facilitating social learning.This article is part of the theme issue 'Animal culture: conservation in a changing world'.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesSocial LearningAnimalscaptive-to-wild translocationconservation behaviourconservation breedingnon-human culturereintroductionwild-to-wild translocation

Identifiers

PMID40308141
PMCPMC12044373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.