Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40308133›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2025

Ecology and conservation of socially learned foraging tactics in odontocetes.

Taylor A Hersh, Daiane S Marcondes, Gabriel F Fonseca, João V S Valle-Pereira, Michaela A Kratofil, Alexandre M S Machado, Shanan Atkins, Kyra R Bankhead, Kiera McGarvey, Muhammad Mahmudur Rahman and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Cultural processes and demography: implications for conservation and beyond.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Ecology and conservation of socially learned foraging tactics in odontocetes.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Social learning and culture in birds: emerging patterns and relevance to conservation.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Integrating cultural dimensions in sperm whale (Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  7. Animal culture: conservation in a changing world.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Culture and conservation in baleen whales.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  9. The flexibility of social learning and its conservation implications in mammals and beyond.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Taylor A HershMarine Mammal Institute, Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, & Conservation Sciences, Oregon State University, Newport, OR 97365, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7891-596X
Daiane S Marcondes *Marine Mammal Institute, Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, & Conservation Sciences, Oregon State University, Newport, OR 97365, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6705-7779
Gabriel F Fonseca *Marine Mammal Institute, Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, & Conservation Sciences, Oregon State University, Newport, OR 97365, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-1491-8258
João V S Valle-Pereira *Marine Mammal Institute, Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, & Conservation Sciences, Oregon State University, Newport, OR 97365, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1880-9495
Michaela A Kratofil *Marine Mammal Institute, Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, & Conservation Sciences, Oregon State University, Newport, OR 97365, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9519-9152
Alexandre M S Machado *Department of Ecology and Zoology, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina 88040-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6252-6890
Shanan Atkins *School of Animal, Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Gauteng 2000, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-2327-5077
Kyra R Bankhead *Marine Mammal Institute, Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, & Conservation Sciences, Oregon State University, Newport, OR 97365, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5194-2802
Kiera McGarveyMarine Mammal Institute, Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, & Conservation Sciences, Oregon State University, Newport, OR 97365, USA.
Muhammad Mahmudur RahmanMarine Mammal Institute, Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, & Conservation Sciences, Oregon State University, Newport, OR 97365, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-2800-9199
Stephane P G de MouraMarine Mammal Institute, Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, & Conservation Sciences, Oregon State University, Newport, OR 97365, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8715-2845
Fernanda FecciCenter for Marine Studies, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Pontal do Paraná, Paraná 83255-976, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3587-1362
Mauricio CantorMarine Mammal Institute, Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, & Conservation Sciences, Oregon State University, Newport, OR 97365, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0019-5106

Funding

College of Agricultural Sciences, Oregon State UniversityConselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento Tecnológico (CNPq)Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)National Geographic SocietyNational Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship ProgramOregon State University - Jungers Faculty Development and Research FundOregon State University - Marine Mammal InstituteOregon State University - Marine Mammal Research Program FundOregon State University - Marine Studies InitiativeOregon State University - Oregon Gray Whale License Plate Program
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Culture-group-typical behaviour shared by community members that rely on socially learned and transmitted information-can drive animal adaptations to local environments and thus has the potential of generating specialized behavioural tactics to solve fundamental life challenges, including capturing prey. However, as human activities rapidly change the world in unprecedented ways, animal foraging cultures may no longer represent optimal solutions to local environments. Odontocetes (toothed whales, dolphins and porpoises) are of particular concern because they rely on learned, specialized foraging tactics in habitats highly affected by human activities. We present a global inventory of odontocete foraging tactics to evaluate their cultural underpinnings, vulnerability to human-induced threats and how this knowledge can inform safeguards. Our synthesis reveals a diverse repertoire-190 cases of 36 foraging tactics in 21 species-but highlights that linkages between culture and anthropogenic impacts are generally obscured by a dearth of data on individual identity, social associations and behavioural diffusion. By identifying global patterns, knowledge gaps and common threats to specialized foraging, our review can guide long-term research towards understanding their ecological and evolutionary drivers. This crucial first step towards designing policies that mitigate human impacts on marine habitats may ultimately protect the diverse odontocete behavioural repertoires that contribute to their survival.This article is part of the theme issue 'Animal culture: conservation in a changing world'.

Indexed as

CetaceaConservation of Natural ResourcesFeeding BehaviorSocial LearningAnimalsEcosystemPredatory BehaviorSocial Behavioranimal cultureanthropogenic impactforaging specializationodontocetesocial learning

Identifiers

PMID40308133
PMCPMC12044383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.