Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40308015›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea)2025

Multiple Sclerosis After the Age of 50 Years: A Comparative Analysis of Late Onset and Adult Onset.

Ricardo Soares-Dos-Reis, Pedro Silva, Francisca Ferreira, Mafalda Seabra, Teresa Mendonça, Pedro Abreu, Joana Guimarães

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ricardo Soares-Dos-Reis *Neurology Department, São João Local Health Unit, Porto, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6878-8568
Pedro Silva *Department of Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4341-4488
Francisca Ferreira *Neurology Department, São João Local Health Unit, Porto, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4584-1228
Mafalda SeabraNeurology Department, São João Local Health Unit, Porto, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9572-0462
Teresa MendonçaNeurology Department, São João Local Health Unit, Porto, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7484-9064
Pedro AbreuNeurology Department, São João Local Health Unit, Porto, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7927-0294
Joana GuimarãesNeurology Department, São João Local Health Unit, Porto, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1540-1395

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThe incidence of multiple sclerosis (MS) among older patients is increasing. Some of these patients develop the disease after the age of 50 years, a condition known as late-onset MS (LOMS). This study aimed to characterize MS in older patients (50-75 years-old) by comparing LOMS with adult-onset MS (AOMS).

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed data from 230 patients aged 50-75 years who attended a Portuguese tertiary referral center.

resultsThis study included 189 AOMS patients aged 58 [54-63] years (median [interquartile range]) and 41 LOMS patients aged 67 [61-70] years. Females predominated in both the LOMS (70.7%) and AOMS (75.1%) groups. Primary progressive MS was more common in LOMS than AOMS patients (19.5% vs. 8.0%,

conclusionsThe LOMS patients presented with higher EDSS scores at the diagnosis, reaching a level of disability not significantly different from AOMS patients of the same age group despite a shorter disease course.

Indexed as

age at onsetaginglate-onset disordersmultiple sclerosispersons with disabilities

Identifiers

PMID40308015
PMCPMC12056141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.