ArticleWater science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research2025
Coupled exponential smoothing and gray model for water quality prediction in the Guo River, China.
Article in Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To address the issue of poor prediction accuracy and performance caused by the influence of the original data sequence on the first-order single-variable gray model (GM(1,1)), this study proposes an exponential smoothing gray model (ESGM(1,1)). Taking the Anliu Station situated at the border between Henan and Anhui provinces as an example, ammonia nitrogen and the permanganate index were selected for water quality prediction using the GM(1,1) and ESGM(1,1) models from 2010 to 2021. The fitting accuracy of these models is evaluated by comparing the computed values with the actual monitored water quality index values. The results reveal that the average relative percentage error in the simulation period decreased by 3.01% compared with GM(1,1) and further decreased by 27.41% during the verification period. The mean square error ratio
Indexed as
Identifiers
40307967What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.