ArticleJournal of intensive care2025
One-year outcomes in sepsis: a prospective multicenter cohort study in Japan.
Article in Journal of intensive care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- In-hospital development of new-onset frailty and discharge outcomes among patients with sepsis: a Korean multicenter registry study.Journal of intensive care · 2026Article
- Measuring health-related quality of life in sepsis survivors and caregivers: a mapping review and a preliminary conceptual framework.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026Review
- Association between ICU rehabilitation parameters and recovery of activities of daily living in mechanically ventilated patients: A multicenter prospective observational study.Journal of intensive medicine · 2026Article
- Incidence and risk factors of post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) in sepsis survivors: a prospective, observational study.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Observational
- From Resuscitation to Rehabilitation: The Post-Intensive Care Syndrome Continuum in Sepsis Care.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Long-term mental health change patterns in ICU survivors: a four-year comparative follow-up from the SMAP-HoPe study.Journal of intensive care · 2025Article
- Correction: One-year outcomes in sepsis: a prospective multicenter cohort study in Japan.Journal of intensive care · 2025Article
- Analysis of the prevalence and risk factors of post-intensive-care syndrome and post-sepsis syndrome in survivors of sepsis.Science progressArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSepsis is a leading cause of death in intensive care units (ICU). Sepsis survivors are often left with significant morbidity, termed post-intensive care syndrome (PICS), impacting post-sepsis life. The aim was to present detailed data on the prognostic and functional long-term outcomes of ICU patients with sepsis in Japan, which is currently lacking and therefore prevents development of targeted solutions.
methodsA multicenter prospective study, involving 21 ICUs in 20 tertiary hospitals in Japan, included all consecutive adult ICU patients between November 2020 and April 2022, and diagnosed with sepsis at ICU admission (Sepsis 3). Follow-ups were performed at 3, 6, and 12 months after hospital discharge by telephone and mail. Primary outcome was death or incidence of PICS, defined by any of physical dysfunction (Barthel Index ≤ 90), cognitive dysfunction (Short Memory Questionnaire < 40), or mental disorder (any subscales for anxiety or depression of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale ≥ 8, or Impact of Event Scale-Revised ≥ 25). Secondary outcomes included Quality of Life (QOL), employment, and use of hospital, emergency, rehabilitation, and psychiatric services. A multivariable analysis investigated independent factors associated with each dysfunction at each follow-up.
resultsA total of 339 patients were included (median age 74 [67-82] years, 60% male, 77% septic shock, and a median SOFA of 9 [6-12]). Mortality was 23% at hospital discharge, increasing to 37% at 12 months. The rate of death for those who met PICS Criteria at hospital discharge was 89%, with a death or PICS incidence of 73%, 64%, and 65% at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Limited improvements in QOL and return to work (44%), high rates of hospital readmissions (40%), frequent emergency service usage (31%), and low utilization of rehabilitation and psychiatric services (15% and 7%) were identified over the first year. The incidence of any PICS-related dysfunction was consistently an independent factor for the incidence of the same dysfunction at the following follow-ups.
conclusionsThis multicenter study identified the distinct realities of post-sepsis life in Japanese ICU patients, highlighting the unique challenges in improving their functions and returning to daily life. Trial Registration University Hospital Medical Information Network UMIN000041433.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.