ArticleActa veterinaria Scandinavica2025
Improved pharmacotherapy after revised dosing regimens of two slow-release formulations of benzylpenicillin in an Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae infection model in pigs.
Article in Acta veterinaria Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae - today's perspective on advances and challenges (2017- 2026).BMC veterinary research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundActinobacillus pleuropneumoniae (APP) is a Gram-negative bacterium that causes respiratory disease in pigs, resulting in significant economic losses and reduced animal welfare. In Sweden, the drug of choice for treatment of APP infections is benzylpenicillin. However, limited pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data for benzylpenicillin in pigs have led to variations in recommended dosing regimens. In this study, the impact of different dosing regimens and benzylpenicillin preparations on the progression of APP infection in pigs was investigated. Two experimental trials involving a total of 66 pigs were conducted. Pigs were intranasally inoculated with a pathogenic strain of APP serotype 2, and treatment was initiated upon the appearance of clinical signs. Two intramuscularly administered benzylpenicillin formulations, an aqueous and an oil-based suspension, were used with varying dosing regimens. The clinical outcome was assessed based on respiratory signs and rectal temperature measurements. Blood samples were collected for measuring white blood cell counts, serum antibody levels, and acute-phase protein concentrations. Necropsies were performed to evaluate lung lesions and to reisolate APP.
resultsThe results indicated that benzylpenicillin dosing regimens of 20-30 mg/kg administered every 12 h achieved larger benzylpenicillin plasma-exposure compared to the labelled dose of 10-30 mg/kg every 24 h. The oil-based suspension demonstrated superior efficacy compared to the aqueous suspension. Dosing regimens that maintain effective plasma concentrations of benzylpenicillin were shown to have better clinical outcomes as measured by reduced lung lesions at necropsy. Increased benzylpenicillin exposure was associated with a better ranking of overall treatment response.
conclusionsSeveral dosing regimens that increased the plasma benzylpenicillin exposure were associated with better clinical success than the labelled doses. The findings support the treatment of APP-infected pigs with optimised benzylpenicillin dosing regimens. Optimising the use of existing antibiotics is crucial given the limited development of new antimicrobial agents and the need to combat antimicrobial resistance with regards to both human and animal health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.