ArticleBMC psychology2025
Evaluating career self-awareness instruments for victims of violence using the Rasch model.
Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVictims of violence have trauma that often affects career development. A tool is needed to measure a person's self-perception of self and work environment. The main problems in instrument measurement are items that are not independent of what is measured, instrument tests that are not linear and do not have significant value accuracy, lack of empirical coherence of responses, items, and constructs, and missing data errors. the purpose of solving these problems requires in-depth analysis using the Rasch model.
methodsThis research examines the validity and reliability of career self-awareness instruments with victims of violence. The research was conducted with 50 victims of violence in Bandung City. A quantitative approach with a cross-sectional study design was used. Data were analyzed using the Rasch model and Winsteps 3.73 application, Rasch model procedures and criteria are unidimensionality, person instrument analysis and item reliability, person item map, item difficulty, item fit, rating scale diagnostics, and item bias detection.
resultsThe significance of the research findings is assessed based on unidimensionality in the "good" category, Analysis based on Andrich's threshold shows the score increased to the appropriate level, Cronbach alpha value represents the interaction between person and item in the good category, and the person reliability value is 0.89 while the item reliability is 0.98.
conclusionBased on these results, a career self-awareness instrument can be used to assess and measure the level of career self-awareness of victims of violence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.