Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40307901›Full record

ArticleBMC global and public health2025

Analytic methodology for demographic variation analyses for wave 1 of the global flourishing study.

R Noah Padgett, Matt Bradshaw, Ying Chen, Richard G Cowden, Sung Joon Jang, Eric S Kim, Koichiro Shiba, Byron R Johnson, Tyler J VanderWeele

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in BMC global and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

R Noah PadgettDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Matt BradshawInstitute for Studies of Religion, Baylor University, Waco, TX, USA.
Ying ChenDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Richard G CowdenDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Sung Joon JangInstitute for Studies of Religion, Baylor University, Waco, TX, USA.
Eric S KimDepartment of Psychology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Koichiro ShibaSchool of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Byron R JohnsonInstitute for Studies of Religion, Department of Sociology, Baylor University, Waco, TX, USA.
Tyler J VanderWeeleHuman Flourishing Program, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA. tvanderw@hsph.harvard.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this article, we describe the statistical and design methodology of the demographic variation analyses used as part of a coordinated set of manuscripts for wave 1 of the Global Flourishing Study (GFS). Aspects covered include the following: evaluating demographic variation, accounting for the complex sampling design, missing data and imputation, and meta-analysis. We provide a brief illustrative example of the demographic variation analyses using a measure of purpose in life from the GFS survey and conclude by outlining some strengths and limitations of the analytic and statistical methodology employed.

Indexed as

DemographicsGlobal Flourishing StudyHeterogeneityMeta-analysisMethodology

Identifiers

PMID40307901
PMCPMC12042347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.