ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2025
Lessons learned from the participatory development of a framework to actively involve people living with dementia, individuals from their social networks, and healthcare professionals in systematic reviews: the DECIDE-SR study.
Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- [Participation in health services research : The development of a preliminary framework for joint research involving people living with dementia, relatives and various professional groups].Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Becoming a coresearcher in dementia care research: a mixed-methods study protocol for evaluation of theBMJ open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo date, there is no framework for actively involving people living with dementia, individuals from their social networks and healthcare professionals in systematic reviews (SRs). Additionally, no SRs have been planned or partially carried out with the active involvement of these individuals. For these reasons, a framework and a review protocol for a planned SR were developed as part of the federal-funded DECIDE-SR project, in which the abovementioned groups were actively involved as coresearchers. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the project and to illustrate the lessons learned from conducting active research involving this case example.
methodsA framework for actively involving coresearchers in SRs was developed via the synthesis of theoretical and empirical findings from a previous research project. The coresearchers participated in meetings and one workshop, which were planned on the basis of the INVOLVE criteria and the ACTIVE framework model, to test and reflect on the previously developed framework. Additionally, an SR protocol was jointly planned during these meetings, and individual SR steps were conducted (e.g., development of the research question). The lessons learned were drawn from the workshop with the coresearchers, who were clustered using the Engaging with Purpose Patient Engagement Framework (EwPPEF).
resultsEight coresearchers were actively involved in 15 meetings and one workshop to test and reflect on the framework. The framework allows coresearchers to individually choose their own level of involvement (where the levels are nonhierarchical), and the individual support needs at each step of an SR are considered. Additionally, an SR protocol was developed together with the research question "What is the effect of hospital treatment provided in one's own living place on people living with dementia?". The lessons learned provide information on all aspects of the EwPPEF (e.g., cobuilding, impact, and inclusiveness) and include implications for conducting SRs that actively involve the public.
conclusionsThe framework and the SR protocol can now be used for further tests and to gain initial experience in conducting SRs that actively involve the public. Furthermore, the lessons learned can provide other project groups with important insights into actively planning and conducting SRs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.