Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40307861›Full record

ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2025

Lessons learned from the participatory development of a framework to actively involve people living with dementia, individuals from their social networks, and healthcare professionals in systematic reviews: the DECIDE-SR study.

Mike Rommerskirch-Manietta, Christina Manietta, Anna Louisa Hoffmann-Hoffrichter, Helga Rohra, Lisa Fink, Heidemarie Kelleter, Helga Elisabeth Breimaier, Johanna Möller, Stefanie Oberfeld, Birgit Alpers and 1 more

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mike Rommerskirch-Manietta *Deutsches Zentrum Für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Site Witten, Witten, Germany. Mike.Rommerskirch-Manietta@dzne.de.
Christina Manietta *Deutsches Zentrum Für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Site Witten, Witten, Germany.
Anna Louisa Hoffmann-HoffrichterDeutsches Zentrum Für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Site Witten, Witten, Germany.
Helga RohraDeutsches Zentrum Für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Patient Advisory Board, Bonn, Germany.
Lisa FinkWitten/Herdecke University, Faculty of Health, Department of Nursing Science, Witten, Germany.
Heidemarie KelleterDiocesan Caritas Association for the Archdiocese of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Helga Elisabeth BreimaierUniversity and Rehabilitation Clinics Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Johanna MöllerDiocesan Caritas Association for the Archdiocese of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Stefanie OberfeldSt. Rochus Hospital, Department of Geriatric Psychiatry, Telgte, Germany.
Birgit AlpersMedical Center Hamburg Eppendorf (UKE), Director of Patient and Care Management, Hamburg, Germany.
Martina RoesDeutsches Zentrum Für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Site Witten, Witten, Germany.

Funding

Federal Ministry of Education and Research in Germany 01KG2213
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo date, there is no framework for actively involving people living with dementia, individuals from their social networks and healthcare professionals in systematic reviews (SRs). Additionally, no SRs have been planned or partially carried out with the active involvement of these individuals. For these reasons, a framework and a review protocol for a planned SR were developed as part of the federal-funded DECIDE-SR project, in which the abovementioned groups were actively involved as coresearchers. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the project and to illustrate the lessons learned from conducting active research involving this case example.

methodsA framework for actively involving coresearchers in SRs was developed via the synthesis of theoretical and empirical findings from a previous research project. The coresearchers participated in meetings and one workshop, which were planned on the basis of the INVOLVE criteria and the ACTIVE framework model, to test and reflect on the previously developed framework. Additionally, an SR protocol was jointly planned during these meetings, and individual SR steps were conducted (e.g., development of the research question). The lessons learned were drawn from the workshop with the coresearchers, who were clustered using the Engaging with Purpose Patient Engagement Framework (EwPPEF).

resultsEight coresearchers were actively involved in 15 meetings and one workshop to test and reflect on the framework. The framework allows coresearchers to individually choose their own level of involvement (where the levels are nonhierarchical), and the individual support needs at each step of an SR are considered. Additionally, an SR protocol was developed together with the research question "What is the effect of hospital treatment provided in one's own living place on people living with dementia?". The lessons learned provide information on all aspects of the EwPPEF (e.g., cobuilding, impact, and inclusiveness) and include implications for conducting SRs that actively involve the public.

conclusionsThe framework and the SR protocol can now be used for further tests and to gain initial experience in conducting SRs that actively involve the public. Furthermore, the lessons learned can provide other project groups with important insights into actively planning and conducting SRs.

Indexed as

CollaborationDementiaFrameworkParticipatory researchPublic

Identifiers

PMID40307861
PMCPMC12044785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.