ArticleBMC medical education2025
Attitudes toward and perceptions of barriers to research among medical students in the context of an educational and motivational strategy.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dental professionals' knowledge and awareness of teledentistry.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Embedding research education and scholarly project development into a medical education curriculum: a transferable glocalized curriculum model.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- The problem is escalating: Barriers faced by medical students in conducting research; A scoping literature review.PloS one · 2026Article
- Healthcare Providers' Perspectives on the Involvement of Mental Health Providers in Chronic Pain Management.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Student Research Involvement as a Supplementary Teaching Approach: A Prospective Evaluation.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundScientific research is a key component of medical education, fostering critical thinking and evidence-based practice. However, international studies have reported wide variability in medical students' attitudes toward research, shaped by institutional culture, exposure, and curricular design. In parallel, perceived barriers-such as academic overload, lack of mentorship, and insufficient training-are frequently cited as major obstacles that limit student involvement. Understanding students' predispositions and the barriers they face is essential for developing effective strategies, especially in educational contexts where research participation is limited. This study aimed to evaluate the situation at a private medical school in Ecuador.
objectiveTo evaluate medical students' attitudes toward and perceptions of barriers to research and to analyze changes in these variables following an educational and motivational intervention.
methodsA quasiexperimental study (without a control group) was conducted with 90 undergraduate medical students. The intervention consisted of educational and motivational audiovisual content delivered over one month. A validated questionnaire assessed students' attitudes and perceived barriers before and after the intervention. Descriptive statistics and a one-sample t-test were used to assess changes.
resultsPrior to the intervention, the mean attitude score was 104.72, well above the scale midpoint (78), indicating a generally favorable predisposition. Most students (73.3%) scored above 75% of the maximum possible score in attitudes. For perceived barriers, the initial mean was 109.61, also above the scale midpoint (87), reflecting a high level of perceived obstacles. A total of 96.7% of students scored above 50%, with key concerns related to time constraints, lack of mentorship, and insufficient training in scientific writing and statistics. After the intervention, both the mean attitude score and the mean barrier score remained statistically unchanged.
conclusionsAlthough the intervention produced a small increase in favorable attitudes, it did not reduce perceived barriers. These findings suggest that short, self-directed strategies are insufficient to address institutional challenges. More effective approaches may require long-term, interactive programs supported by curricular integration, structured mentorship, and institutional investment to foster meaningful research engagement among medical students.
trial registrationNot applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.