Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40307799›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

Evidence-based practice utilization and associated factors among nurses in the emergency department of selected public hospitals, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2024: cross-sectional study.

Mekuanint Kassie, Achamyelesh Tadele, Lemlem Beza, Ousman Adal, Aklilu Azazh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mekuanint KassieFederal Prison General Hospital, Addis Ababa City, Ethiopia.
Achamyelesh TadeleCollege of Health Science, Department of Emergency and Critical, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa City, Ethiopia.
Lemlem BezaCollege of Health Science, Department of Emergency and Critical Nursing, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa City, Ethiopia. lemnene33@yahoo.com.
Ousman AdalDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Bahir Dar University, P.O. Box 79, Bahir Dar City, Ethiopia. adalousman5@gmail.com.
Aklilu AzazhCollege of Health Science, Department of Emergency Medicine, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa City, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence-based practice use refers to the integration of current, reliable, and relevant evidence into healthcare decision-making. This includes findings from studies, professional experiences, and updated guidelines aimed at minimizing biases and enhancing clinical decisions based on comprehensive research.

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the use of evidence-based practices and identify associated factors among nurses working in the emergency departments of selected public hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, in 2024.

methodsThis institution-based cross-sectional study assessed evidence-based practice use among emergency department nurses. A lottery method of simple random sampling was used to select 233 participants from 542 nurses registered in the nurse manager office. Only 233 nurses were invited to participate in the study, and only 225 responded, resulting in a non-response rate of 3.4% (equivalent to 8 nurses). Data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire that was adapted and modified, comprising six sections with 59 items. Binary logistic regression was used to explore the associations between dependent and independent variables. Variables with a P value of less than 0.05 were deemed significantly associated with the utilization of evidence-based practices.

resultsAmong the 225 nurses who participated in the study, 101 nurses (44.9%, 95% CI: 39.0-52.0%) demonstrated good use of evidence-based practice. The analysis revealed several factors associated with the use of evidence-based practice. Female nurses had an adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of 1.4 (95% CI: 1.201-3.923) for evidence-based practice use compared with male nurses. Nurses with a Master's degree (AOR = 6.786, 95% CI: 1.141-40.352) and coordinator nurses (AOR = 13.191, 95% CI: 1.843-94.414) were also more likely to utilize evidence-based practices than staff nurses. Additionally, nurses with good knowledge of evidence-based practices had an AOR of 3.801 (95% CI: 1.700-8.498), and those who believed that relevant literature was unavailable had an AOR of 3.316 (95% CI: 1.334-8.246).

conclusionThis study identified important factors affecting the use of evidence-based practice among nurses. Female nurses, those with advanced degrees, and nurse coordinators are more likely to engage in this practice. Good knowledge of evidence-based methods enhances their utilization, whereas beliefs about limited access to relevant literature can hinder such utilization. These findings suggest that improving education and access to research resources could boost patient care outcomes. Additionally, nursing leaders and administrators can help overcome barriers by providing training, allowing time off for EBP activities, and adjusting work schedules accordingly.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalEvidence-Based PracticeHospitals, PublicNursing Staff, HospitalAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEthiopiaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultEvidence-based practiceEvidence-based practice use

Identifiers

PMID40307799
PMCPMC12044898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.