ArticleBMC health services research2025
Evidence-based practice utilization and associated factors among nurses in the emergency department of selected public hospitals, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2024: cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Limited Evidence to Fully Determine the Implementation of Evidence-Based Practice by Healthcare Providers in Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of evidence-based medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Uptake of evidence-based practice and its predictors among nurses in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Pooled it
- Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP) Prevention Bundle: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Saudi Study to Assess Knowledge, Adherence, and Perceived Barriers Among ICU Practitioners in Hail Region.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Nurses' Attitudes, Environmental Perceptions and Involvement in Research: A Multisite Study.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2025Article
- Factors Associated with Evidence-Based Decision-Making Among Specialized Nurses Working in Selected Health Facilities in Nairobi, Kenya.The East African health research journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEvidence-based practice use refers to the integration of current, reliable, and relevant evidence into healthcare decision-making. This includes findings from studies, professional experiences, and updated guidelines aimed at minimizing biases and enhancing clinical decisions based on comprehensive research.
objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the use of evidence-based practices and identify associated factors among nurses working in the emergency departments of selected public hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, in 2024.
methodsThis institution-based cross-sectional study assessed evidence-based practice use among emergency department nurses. A lottery method of simple random sampling was used to select 233 participants from 542 nurses registered in the nurse manager office. Only 233 nurses were invited to participate in the study, and only 225 responded, resulting in a non-response rate of 3.4% (equivalent to 8 nurses). Data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire that was adapted and modified, comprising six sections with 59 items. Binary logistic regression was used to explore the associations between dependent and independent variables. Variables with a P value of less than 0.05 were deemed significantly associated with the utilization of evidence-based practices.
resultsAmong the 225 nurses who participated in the study, 101 nurses (44.9%, 95% CI: 39.0-52.0%) demonstrated good use of evidence-based practice. The analysis revealed several factors associated with the use of evidence-based practice. Female nurses had an adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of 1.4 (95% CI: 1.201-3.923) for evidence-based practice use compared with male nurses. Nurses with a Master's degree (AOR = 6.786, 95% CI: 1.141-40.352) and coordinator nurses (AOR = 13.191, 95% CI: 1.843-94.414) were also more likely to utilize evidence-based practices than staff nurses. Additionally, nurses with good knowledge of evidence-based practices had an AOR of 3.801 (95% CI: 1.700-8.498), and those who believed that relevant literature was unavailable had an AOR of 3.316 (95% CI: 1.334-8.246).
conclusionThis study identified important factors affecting the use of evidence-based practice among nurses. Female nurses, those with advanced degrees, and nurse coordinators are more likely to engage in this practice. Good knowledge of evidence-based methods enhances their utilization, whereas beliefs about limited access to relevant literature can hinder such utilization. These findings suggest that improving education and access to research resources could boost patient care outcomes. Additionally, nursing leaders and administrators can help overcome barriers by providing training, allowing time off for EBP activities, and adjusting work schedules accordingly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.