Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40307770›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

Assessment of anaesthesia trainees using performance metrics derived from electronic health records: a longitudinal cohort analysis.

Razvan Bologheanu, Robert Greif, Alessa Stria, Daniel Laxar, Andreas Gleiss, Oliver Kimberger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Razvan BologheanuMedical University of Vienna, Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, Clinical Division of General Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna, 1090, Austria. razvan.bologheanu@meduniwien.ac.at.
Robert GreifDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Pain Therapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Alessa StriaMedical University of Vienna, Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, Clinical Division of General Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna, 1090, Austria.
Daniel LaxarMedical University of Vienna, Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, Clinical Division of General Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna, 1090, Austria.
Andreas GleissCentre for Medical Data Science, Institute of Clinical Biometrics, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Oliver KimbergerMedical University of Vienna, Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, Clinical Division of General Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna, 1090, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe development of competencies in anaesthesia residents is assessed by direct observation of their performance and written and oral examinations. Little is known about how residents' competencies are reflected by objective data in anaesthetic records. We investigated whether performance metrics derived from electronic anaesthesia records are associated with anaesthesia residents' progress of training and European written examination timing and results.

methodsWe recruited 46 anaesthesia providers who trained at the Vienna University Hospital between September 2013 and June 2021, and we reviewed the anaesthesia records of all cases they managed during the study period. We derived six performance measures based on perioperative data routinely collected: intraoperative hypotension and hypothermia, glycaemic control, postoperative nausea and vomiting prevention, lung-protective ventilation, and postoperative kidney injury. We evaluated the association between these quality metrics with training level and written exam completion status in anaesthesia residents after adjusting for patient and surgical factors.

resultsWe found a statistically significant association between the level of training and most performance measures. The probability of preventing intraoperative hypotension increased (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.12 - 1.20) with the level of training, as did the probability of preventing hypothermia (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.05 - 1.11) and administering appropriate postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.15 - 1.27). However, the odds of preventing acute kidney injury decreased (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.83 - 0.99), as did the use of lung-protective ventilation (OR 0.94, 95% 0.92 - 0.97). All participating residents who took the written exam passed it, precluding a direct pass versus fail comparison, but the exam completion status was associated with increased odds of lung-protective ventilation (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.03 - 1.95) and decreased odds of preventing intraoperative hypotension (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.49 - 0.99). Glycaemic control was not associated with either of the training milestones.

conclusionsThe training level of anaesthesia residents had a significant association with several performance metrics. Passing the written exam only had a modest effect. Performance measures based on patient outcomes and intraoperative care may serve as assessment methods for anaesthesia residents' progress tracking.

Indexed as

AnesthesiologyClinical CompetenceEducational MeasurementElectronic Health RecordsInternship and ResidencyAdultFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleAssessmentElectronic health recordsExaminationResidencyTraining

Identifiers

PMID40307770
PMCPMC12044956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.