ArticleDiagnostic pathology2025
Diagnostic insights into solid pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas: a decade of experience with pediatric representation.
Article in Diagnostic pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas with postoperative multiple liver metastases in an older woman: a case report.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a nomogram for overall survival in pancreatic solid pseudopapillary neoplasm: a population-based study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Clinicopathological and prognostic insights into Embryonal Tumors with Multilayered Rosettes (ETMRs).Diagnostic pathology · 2026Article
- Pediatric Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasm With Aberrant CD31 Expression: A Potential Diagnostic Pitfall.Cureus · 2026Article
- Giant solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas in an adolescent girl: a case report with narrative review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- "Exosomal blueprint of lung-tropic metastasis: molecular signatures, microenvironmental conditioning, and translational implications in cancer".Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Review
- Clinicopathological insights and management of liver metastases: Current advances and future perspectives.World journal of hepatology · 2025Review
- Review
- 4D-printed microdevices for spatiotemporal detection of ctDNA and miRNA in pancreatic cancer: an in-depth review.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSolid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs) of the pancreas are rare, low-grade malignancies that predominantly affect young females. Their diagnosis is often facilitated by a characteristic histomorphological pattern and immunohistochemical profile. However, diagnostic challenges persist, especially in pediatric and atypical presentations. Recent attention has focused on the diagnostic value of CD99 and LEF1 in distinguishing SPNs from other pancreatic neoplasms.
objectiveTo evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and utility of CD99 and LEF1 as immunohistochemical markers for SPNs.
methodsA retrospective analysis of 60 SPN cases diagnosed between 2015 and 2024 was performed. Histopathological features were systematically reviewed, and immunohistochemical staining for CD99, LEF1, β-catenin, Cyclin D1, PR, Ki-67 was evaluated. Immunohistochemical marker interpretation was standardized using internally validated thresholds informed by existing literature: CD99 was considered positive with ≥ 10% cytoplasmic staining exhibiting paranuclear accentuation; β-catenin positivity was defined by ≥ 5% nuclear localization; Cyclin D1 by ≥ 10% moderate-to-strong nuclear staining; and progesterone receptor (PR) expression by ≥ 1% nuclear positivity, consistent with hormone receptor evaluation guidelines. Marker expression was statistically analyzed for their associations.
resultsSPNs exhibited a strong female predilection (F:M ratio ≈ 7:1), with a mean age of 32.5 years. Pediatric cases (n = 4) displayed higher mean expression of CD99 (73.8%) and LEF1 (86.5%) compared to adults. CD99 showed cytoplasmic positivity with paranuclear accentuation in 96.7% of cases, while LEF1 demonstrated nuclear staining in 91.7%. β-catenin nuclear localization was observed in 95% of tumors, reflecting Wnt/β-catenin pathway activation. Cyclin D1 and PR were expressed in 90% and 88.3% of cases, respectively. Co-expression of β-catenin, CD99, LEF1, Cyclin D1, and PR was observed in 73.3% of tumors. CD99 and LEF1 inversely correlated with tumor size and proliferative activity (Ki-67), whereas Cyclin D1 and Ki-67 positively correlated with tumor size and lymphovascular invasion (LVI). Pediatric tumors generally exhibited favorable profiles, with limited evidence of LVI.
conclusionSPNs present with distinctive immunohistochemical signatures that are critical for accurate diagnosis, particularly in morphologically ambiguous or pediatric cases. CD99 and LEF1 are highly sensitive markers that, in combination with β-catenin and Cyclin D1, enhance diagnostic precision. These findings emphasize the central role of Wnt/β-catenin signaling in SPN pathogenesis and underscore the importance of integrating clinicopathological and molecular data for comprehensive tumor assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.