Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40307754›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2025

Evaluation of treatment options for atrophic mandible under trauma forces: a 3D finite element analysis treatment options for atrophic mandible under trauma forces.

İpek Dilara Baş, Emre Tosun, Ilgın Ari, Gülin Acar

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

İpek Dilara BaşDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Fakülteler Neighborhood, 1 th floor, Altındağ, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-2419-0182
Emre TosunDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Fakülteler Neighborhood, 1 th floor, Altındağ, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4441-9818
Ilgın AriDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Fakülteler Neighborhood, 1 th floor, Altındağ, Ankara, Türkiye. ariilgin@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-4506-9996
Gülin AcarDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Fakülteler Neighborhood, 1 th floor, Altındağ, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4414-9662

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to assess the stress distributions at different treatment options in edentulous and severely atrophic mandibula under trauma forces. MATERIAL AND

methodIn this study, four different treatment methods were applied to a severely atrophic edentulous mandibular model. In Model 1, inferior alveolar nerve lateralization was performed, followed by the placement of six implants. Model 2 utilized the all-on-four approach with implants placed. Model 3 used subperiosteal implants made of PEEK, while Model 4 used titanium subperiosteal implants. Each subperiosteal implant model included 14 osteosynthesis screws positioned in key areas of the mandible. 2000 Newton trauma force was applied anterior side of the mandibula. The maximum principal stress (Pmax), minimum principal stress (Pmin), and Von Mises (VMs) stress values are measured as MPa.

resultsIn this study, Model 4 showed the highest Pmax in the symphysis region, while the other models had similar values. The mandibular condyle exhibited the highest Pmax in Model 1 and the lowest in Model 2. The Pmin values were comparable across all models in the symphysis region. Regarding VMs stress values, balanced stress was observed in the metal frameworks of all models. Model 3 had the most balanced and lowest VMs stress in abutments and abutment screws, while Model 4 had the highest.

conclusionThis FEA study found that both the all-on-4 and PEEK subperiosteal implants are more resistant under trauma forces compared to titanium subperiosteal implants and the 6-implant IANL approach. The PEEK subperiosteal implant offers a less invasive treatment option for fractured mandibles.

Indexed as

Dental Stress AnalysisFinite Element AnalysisImaging, Three-DimensionalJaw, EdentulousMandibleAtrophyBenzophenonesBiomechanical PhenomenaBone ScrewsDental Implantation, EndosseousDental ImplantsHumansKetonesMandibular CondyleMandibular NervePolyethylene GlycolsBenzophenonesDental ImplantsKetonespolyetheretherketonePolyethylene GlycolsPolymersTitaniumAtrophic mandibulaFinite element analysisSubperiosteal implantsTrauma

Identifiers

PMID40307754
PMCPMC12044892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.