Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40307730›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2025

Population structure, genetic diversity, and GWAS analyses with GBS-derived SNPs and silicodart markers unveil genetic potential for breeding and candidate genes for agronomic and root quality traits in an international sugar beet germplasm collection.

Noor Maiwan Bahjat, Mehtap Yıldız, Muhammad Azhar Nadeem, Andres Morales, Josefina Wohlfeiler, Faheem Shahzad Baloch, Murat Tunçtürk, Metin Koçak, Yong Suk Chung, Dariusz Grzebelus and 3 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Advances in Beet (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Pangenomic and Phenotypic Characterization of ColombianInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Noor Maiwan BahjatDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Van, 65080, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1864-9874
Mehtap YıldızDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Van, 65080, Turkey. mehtapyildiz@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6534-5286
Muhammad Azhar NadeemDepartment of Biotechnology, Faculty of Science, Mersin University, Yenişehir, Mersin, 33343, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0637-9619
Andres MoralesInstituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA) Estación Experimental Agropecuaria La Consulta, La Consulta M5567, Argentina.
Josefina WohlfeilerConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA) Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza, Luján de Cuyo M5534, Argentina.
Faheem Shahzad BalochDepartment of Biotechnology, Faculty of Science, Mersin University, Yenişehir, Mersin, 33343, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7470-0080
Murat TunçtürkDepartment of Field Crops, Faculty of Agriculture, Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Van, 65090, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7995-0599
Metin KoçakDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Van, 65080, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8109-5245
Yong Suk ChungDepartment of Plant Resources and Environment, Jeju National University, Jeju, 63243, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3121-7600
Dariusz GrzebelusDepartment of Plant Biology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Horticulture, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Krakow, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6999-913X
Gökhan SadikDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Van, 65080, Turkey.
Cansu KuzğunDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Van, 65080, Turkey.
Pablo Federico CavagnaroConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA) Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza, Luján de Cuyo M5534, Argentina. cavagnaro.pablo@inta.gob.ar.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5838-0876

Funding

Scientific Research Projects Unit (BAP) of Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi FBA-2022-10150
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKnowledge about the degree of genetic diversity and population structure is crucial as it facilitates novel variations that can be used in breeding programs. Similarly, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) can reveal candidate genes controlling traits of interest. Sugar beet is a major industrial crops worldwide, generating 20% of the world's total sugar production. In this work, using genotyping by sequencing (GBS)-derived SNP and silicoDArT markers, we present new insights into the genetic structure and level of genetic diversity in an international sugar beet germplasm (94 accessions from 16 countries). We also performed GWAS to identify candidate genes for agriculturally-relevant traits.

resultsAfter applying various filtering criteria, a total of 4,609 high-quality non-redundant SNPs and 6,950 silicoDArT markers were used for genetic analyses. Calculation of various diversity indices using the SNP (e.g., mean gene diversity: 0.31, MAF: 0.22) and silicoDArT (mean gene diversity: 0.21, MAF: 0.12) data sets revealed the existence of a good level of conserved genetic diversity. Cluster analysis by UPGMA revealed three and two distinct clusters for SNP and DArT data, respectively, with accessions being grouped in general agreement with their geographical origins and their tap root color. Coincidently, structure analysis indicated three (K = 3) and two (K = 2) subpopulations for SNP and DArT data, respectively, with accessions in each subpopulation sharing similar geographic origins and root color; and comparable clustering patterns were also found by principal component analysis. GWAS on 13 root and leaf phenotypic traits allowed the identification of 35 significant marker-trait associations for nine traits and, based on predicted functions of the genes in the genomic regions surrounding the significant markers, 25 candidate genes were identified for four root (fresh weight, width, length, and color) and three leaf traits (shape, blade color, and veins color).

conclusionsThe present work unveiled conserved genetic diversity-evidenced both genetically (by SNP and silicoDArT markers) and phenotypically- exploitable in breeding programs and germplasm curation of sugar beet. Results from GWAS and candidate gene analyses provide a frame work for future studies aiming at deciphering the genetic basis underlying relevant traits for sugar beet and related crop types within Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris.

Indexed as

Beta vulgarisGenetic VariationPolymorphism, Single NucleotideGenes, PlantGenetic MarkersGenome-Wide Association StudyPhenotypePlant BreedingPlant RootsGenetic MarkersBeta vulgarisCandidate genesGenetic diversityGenotyping by sequencingGermplasm characterizationGWAS

Identifiers

PMID40307730
PMCPMC12044756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.