ArticleBMC geriatrics2025
Life-space mobility trajectory patterns and associated characteristics in older cancer survivors: a secondary data analysis.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Trajectories and associated factors of life-space in older patients following percutaneous coronary intervention: a mixed-methods study.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLife-space mobility (LSM) measures the size of the real-world geographic area an individual purposely transverses in their daily life. While older cancer survivors often have declines in LSM that negatively affects their quality of life, independence, and social engagement the factors that predispose to adverse outcomes are unknown. Understanding different patterns of LSM and its decline can help identify those needing support. The purpose of this study was to identify: (1) LSM trajectory patterns and (2) factors associated with those patterns in older cancer survivors.
methodsThis paper reports a secondary data analysis of 153 participants with cancer ≥ 65 years from the University of Alabama Study of Aging. LSM was assessed using the UAB Life-Space Assessment-Composite score (LSA-C) at study entry and every 6 months for 96 months (LSA-C < 60 = restricted LSM). LSM trajectory patterns based on the LSA-C were determined using group-based trajectory analysis. A classification tree analysis revealed factors that predicted the trajectory patterns.
resultsParticipants (n = 153) were a mean age of 76.1 (SD 6.33), mostly male (58%), White (58%), married (55%) or widowed (37%), and had a diagnosis of prostate (37.3%), breast (20.3%), or colon (11.8%) cancer. Three LSM trajectory patterns were identified: (1) high start and stable (37.3%) with unrestricted LSM (LSA-C = 81.2) at study entry, which remained stable over time, (2) high start progressive decline (27.5%) with unrestricted LSM (LSA-C = 78.0) at study entry that progressively declined, and (3) low start progressive decline (35.3%) with restricted LSM level (LSA-C = 42.0) at study entry, which progressively declined. Each pattern was associated with a unique set of demographic and clinical characteristics. Baseline physical performance score was the most important predictor of the LSM trajectory patterns.
conclusionsThree distinct LSM trajectory patterns, each with unique demographic and clinical characteristics, were identified. Because older cancer survivors have distinct LSM patterns, interventions should be tailored to address specific characteristics and clinical needs. LSM measurement can contribute to assessment of older adults generally and should become part of standard assessment in older cancer survivors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.