Trial reportUpdates in surgery2025
Evaluation of the white test effectiveness for the prevention of bile leakage after liver resection: multicenter randomized controlled study.
Trial report in Updates in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Intraoperative "white test" for bile leak detection during liver resection: a video vignette.Journal of minimally invasive surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bile leakage is a common complication after liver resection. It often requires repeated interventions or surgery and prolongs the patient's recovery. The aim of the study was to assess the effectiveness of the leakage test with fat emulsion (the White Test) in preventing postoperative biliary complications. A multicenter (3 hospitals) randomized controlled trial was performed from February 2011 to May 2016. The trial involved only the patients scheduled for major hepatectomies. After liver transection and control of biliary tree leak-proofness, the patients were randomized into two groups-with and without applying the White Test. A comparative assessment of all the White Test participants was conducted. Forty-three patients formed the study group, and 36 patients were included in the control group. The White Test revealed sites of bile leakage (the positive White Test) in 37.2% (16/43) of the patients in the study group. These leakage sites were sealed intraoperatively. One of those patients (6.2%; 1/16) still developed bile leakage after surgery. Bile leakage was still observed in 7.4% (2/27) of patients after the negative White test. The incidence of postoperatively revealed bile leakage in the study and control groups did not have a statistically significant difference: 7% (3/43) and 8.3% (3/36), respectively. All bile leaks were grade B. This study demonstrated that the White Test did not provide any benefit in preventing postoperative bile leakage; therefore, other methods, such as ICG, should be further investigated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.