Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40307656›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2026

Acceptability of Stool-Based DNA Colorectal Cancer Screening among Black/African-American Patients Served by Federally Qualified Health Centers.

Evan Keiser, A Michelle Corbett, Onyema Chido-Amajuoyi, Allison Antoine, Carrie Stehman, Isabella Dorn, David Goines, Noelle K LoConte

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Monitoring of Colorectal Cancer Screening Adherence Among African American Patients of North Florida Community Health Centers.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Evan KeiserSchool of Medicine and Public Health, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA. ejkeiser@wisc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-9576-9942
A Michelle CorbettCenter for Urban Population Health, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Onyema Chido-AmajuoyiUniversity of Washington, Fred Hutch Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Allison AntoineUniversity of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI, USA.
Carrie StehmanCenter for Urban Population Health, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Isabella DornOutreach Community Health Center, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
David GoinesProgressive Community Health Centers, Madison, WI, USA.
Noelle K LoConteUniversity of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI, USA.

Funding

NCI NIH HHS UWCCC: University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA014520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) has an increased burden among Black/African-American populations. Following the COVID-19 pandemic, home-based CRC screening options are being used more frequently. We conducted focus groups to understand the acceptability of stool-based DNA testing for CRC screening in this population. Ten focus groups about the acceptability of various CRC screening modalities were held with Black/African-American participants at two federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Participants were separated into focus groups based on age and gender. Thematic analysis was carried out using NVivo. Across the groups, there were a total of 79 participants, of which 40.5% were aged 40-50 years ("younger participants"), 59.5% aged > 50 years ("older participants"), 53.2% male, and 46.8% female. Overall, knowledge was low regarding perceived risk of CRC. There was limited awareness of CRC screening options among younger patients and widespread lack of knowledge about stool-based DNA testing. Most respondents preferred colonoscopy as their first-choice screening test but were open to other screening tests. Stool-based DNA tests were more preferred among younger participants but was felt to be acceptable across all groups. Given the low awareness/knowledge of screening modalities identified in our study, educational interventions and shared decision making by primary care providers are needed.

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFecesPatient Acceptance of Health CareAdultAgedCOVID-19FemaleFocus GroupsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedWhiteWisconsinColorectal cancerDisparityScreening

Identifiers

PMID40307656
PMCPMC12971806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.