Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40307627›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025

Robotic retroperitoneal lymph-node dissection for testicular cancer: initial experience.

Daniel Peter McNicholas, F Kattakayam, T Thompson, J Hemmant, R Weston, V Hanchanale

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniel Peter McNicholasRoyal Liverpool University Hospital, Prescot Street, Liverpool, Merseyside, L78XP, England. Danielmcnicholas3@gmail.com.
F KattakayamRoyal Liverpool University Hospital, Prescot Street, Liverpool, Merseyside, L78XP, England.
T ThompsonRoyal Liverpool University Hospital, Prescot Street, Liverpool, Merseyside, L78XP, England.
J HemmantRoyal Liverpool University Hospital, Prescot Street, Liverpool, Merseyside, L78XP, England.
R WestonRoyal Liverpool University Hospital, Prescot Street, Liverpool, Merseyside, L78XP, England.
V HanchanaleRoyal Liverpool University Hospital, Prescot Street, Liverpool, Merseyside, L78XP, England.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To show that Robotic-Assisted Retroperitoneal Lymph-Node Dissection (RA-RPLND) is feasible, safe and has good oncological outcomes for patients. We present one of the first case series from the UK regarding this operative approach. This review was registered and carried out in line with the Trust's audit guidelines. A retrospective analysis was conducted on RA-RPLND procedures performed at our centre, all using the da Vinci Si system. We analysed indications, chemotherapy status, complications, and oncological outcomes. Twenty-four patients, with a mean age of 36 years (range: 18-68), underwent RA-RPLND. The most common indication was residual mass (79%), with 92% of patients being post-chemotherapy. Mean console time and blood loss were 171 min and 190 ml, respectively. One case was converted to open surgery due to bleeding from the left renal vein, and one patient developed a chyle leak, managed conservatively. There were no peri-operative deaths. The mean lymph-node packet size was 72 mm, with a mean node yield of 10. Teratoma was the most common pathology (70%). The mean length of stay was 1.5 days. Our case series demonstrates that RA-RPLND is a feasible and safe option for patients. With the growing availability of robotic surgery, this approach may gain popularity, though it requires careful pre-operative planning and advanced robotic skills.

Indexed as

Lymph Node ExcisionRobotic Surgical ProceduresTesticular NeoplasmsAdolescentAdultAgedHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetroperitoneal SpaceRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultPost-chemotherapy RPLNDRobotic-Assisted Retroperitoneal Lymph-Node DissectionRPLNDTesticular cancer

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.