Trial reportJournal of robotic surgery2025
A prospective study comparing sleep quality using Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index at 8 weeks after robotic-assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty: a single-center study.
Trial report in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Comparative pain relief and functional outcomes following robotic-assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty: a GRADE-assessed meta-analysis with meta-regression of randomized controlled trials.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty and the risk of postoperative infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Sleep measurement and clinical impact in osteoarthritis and inflammatory arthritis: a scoping review.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is crucial for alleviating pain and improving the quality of life in patients with end-stage knee arthritis. Postoperative sleep disturbances are common and can persist for months following the surgery, potentially hindering the overall rehabilitation process and the quality of life. Robotic-assisted TKA (RATKA) offers greater precision and less invasiveness than conventional TKA (CTKA), potentially improving postoperative sleep quality. This study aims to compare sleep quality in patients undergoing RATKA versus CTKA. This prospective study (January 2024-June 2024) included 68 patients undergoing unilateral TKA for end-stage osteoarthritis, randomized into RATKA [Cuvis Joint Robotic Assisted System] (n = 34) and CTKA (n = 34) groups. Both the procedures were performed under spinal anesthesia along with Adductor Canal Block. Patients with pre-existing psychiatric conditions, diagnosed sleep disorders, or insomnia medication use were excluded. Postoperatively, patients followed a standardized multimodal pain management protocol. Sleep quality was assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) at 8 weeks post-TKA. Statistical analysis included Student's t test, effect size calculation, and confidence intervals, with significance set at p < 0.05. The baseline and preoperative clinical characteristics were comparable between the groups. At 8 weeks, the RATKA group had a mean PSQI score of 5.68 ±0.71, significantly lower than the CTKA group's score of 6.25 ± 0.92 (p = 0.0057, Cohen's d = 0.68) indicating better sleep quality in the RATKA group. RATKA was associated with significantly better postoperative sleep quality than CTKA at 8 weeks, as indicated by lower PSQI scores. These findings provide preliminary evidence supporting the potential benefits of robotic-assisted techniques in improving sleep outcomes following TKA. RATKA was associated with significantly better postoperative sleep quality than CTKA, likely due to reduced pain, soft-tissue preservation, and optimized implant positioning. These findings suggest potential advantages of robotic-assisted techniques in TKA recovery. Future multicenter studies with larger, more diverse populations and longer follow-up are needed to validate these results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40307626What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.