ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2025
Diagnosis of C5 segmental vertebral artery using magnetic resonance angiography.
Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe vertebral artery (VA) typically enters the subarachnoid space at the atlanto-occipital region. However, segmental variations can occur, with the VA entering the spinal canal at atypical levels. While a C3 segmental VA has been reported, no prior studies describe a C5 segmental VA. This case represents the first documented occurrence of this anomaly.
methodsAn 8-year-old girl underwent brain magnetic resonance imaging for headache screening, which incidentally revealed an abnormal VA course.
resultsImaging revealed the absence of the left VA at the proximal V2 segment. Instead, a radiculomedullary artery at C4/5 entered the spinal canal and contributed to the formation of the anterior spinal artery (ASA), which ascended along the spinal cord. The right VA appeared normal; however, a radiculomedullary artery at the C3/4 level was identified, joining the contralateral radiculomedullary artery at the C1 level to form the ASA. Additionally, bilateral accessory middle cerebral arteries were observed. No clear association was found between this anomaly and the patient's headache, and she remained under observation.
conclusionThis anomaly may result from persistence of the fifth intersegmental artery. The vascular course resembled collateral circulation observed in acquired VA occlusion. Given its proximity to the spinal cord, potential risks include ischemic complications and spinal cord compression. This case highlights the importance of accurate imaging and careful surgical planning. Further studies on these rare vascular anomalies will enhance our understanding of VA variations and their clinical significance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.