ArticleEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2025
Introduction time of highly allergenic foods to the infant diet in a UK cohort and association with a family history of allergy.
Article in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Timing of Allergenic Food Introduction in Infants, Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Evaluating the face validity of early eats: A consumer-focused educational website to enhance practical skills in complementary feeding and early allergen introduction.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2026Article
- Adherence to Guidance About Complementary Feeding and Vitamin D Supplementation in Infants: The Role of Information Sources.Nursing open · 2025Article
- Diet Diversity and Feeding Practices in Toddlers with and Without Food Allergy-A Cross-Sectional Study.Nutrients · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectiveTo describe the introduction of highly allergenic foods in a UK population sample, and to determine whether the introduction of highly allergenic foods differed in infants with family history of allergy. SUBJECTS/
methodsA population birth cohort study recruited eligible pregnant women while they were attending an antenatal ultrasound clinic appointment at a UK city hospital. Parent-reported family history of allergy and infant diet were collected through structured interviews at recruitment and postal questionnaires. Parents reported on their infants' diet and introduction of highly allergenic foods at around 6 months (n = 216) and around 12 months (n = 193), and infant diet around 24 months of age (n = 139).
resultsMost highly allergenic foods were introduced to infants at around 6-9 months. However, nut and egg were introduced much later, and 21% of children had not been exposed to egg and 35% of infants had not been exposed to nuts by 12 months. Family history of allergy did not predict late introduction of any of the highly allergenic foods but infants with a family history of allergy were more likely to have diets that avoided foods due to allergy (most commonly dairy, soya, egg and nuts).
conclusionsThe introduction of egg and nuts was delayed beyond one year of age in a large proportion of infants, and infants with a family history of allergy were more likely to have diets that avoided foods due to allergy. These could be modifiable risk factors for allergy development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.