Trial reportAAPS PharmSciTech2025
Predicting and Confirming Bioequivalence of Alpelisib Oral Granules and Tablets for Patients With PIK3CA-Related Disorders.
Trial report in AAPS PharmSciTech, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alpelisib, an oral α-specific phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor, has been shown to be safe and effective for some patients with gain-of-function mutation in the PIK3CA oncogene. Alpelisib has received US FDA accelerated approval as Vijoice® film-coated tablets to treat severe PIK3CA-Related Overgrowth Spectrum (PROS). PROS typically displays clinical manifestations in the first year of patient life. Therefore, oral granules were developed as an age-appropriate pediatric dosage form. Bioequivalence between alpelisib granules and tablet and the effect of food on granules pharmacokinetics were assessed in a single-center, randomized, three-treatment, six-sequence, three-period, crossover study among 60 healthy adults. Participants were randomly assigned to receive a single 50-mg alpelisib dose as: (i) tablet following a meal, (ii) granules following a meal, and (iii) granules while fasting. Statistical analysis of non-compartmental pharmacokinetic parameters demonstrated bioequivalence between the 50-mg alpelisib granules and tablet forms when administered with food: estimated geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) for granules-versus-tablet area under the curve (AUC) from time zero to infinity (AUC
Indexed as
Identifiers
40307580What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.