ArticleExperimental & molecular medicine2025
Cannabidiol potentiates p53-driven autophagic cell death in non-small cell lung cancer following DNA damage: a novel synergistic approach beyond canonical pathways.
Article in Experimental & molecular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-Driven Combination Therapy for Counteracting Dysregulated Genes in Lung Adenocarcinoma: Contribution-Aware Metaheuristic for Drug Repurposing.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Review
- Review
- Cannabinoid Signaling and Autophagy in Oral Disease: Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Implications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Elucidating the Anticancer Mechanisms of Tetrahydroxycurcumin: A Comprehensive Review of Preclinical Studies.Food science & nutrition · 2025Review
- Phytocannabinoids and Nanotechnology in Lung Cancer: A Review of Therapeutic Strategies with a Focus on Halloysite Nanotubes.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The search for more effective and safer cancer therapies has led to an increasing interest in combination treatments that use well-established agents. Here we explore the potential of cannabidiol (CBD), a compound derived from cannabis, to enhance the anticancer effects of etoposide in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although CBD is primarily used to manage childhood epilepsy, its broader therapeutic applications are being actively investigated, particularly in oncology. Our results revealed that, among various tested chemotherapeutic drugs, etoposide showed the most significant reduction in NSCLC cell viability when combined with CBD. To understand this synergistic effect, we conducted extensive transcriptomic and proteomic profiling, which showed that the combination of CBD and etoposide upregulated genes associated with autophagic cell death while downregulating key oncogenes known to drive tumor progression. This dual effect on cell death and oncogene suppression was mediated by inactivation of the PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling pathway, a crucial regulator of cell growth and survival, and was found to be dependent on the p53 status. Interestingly, our analysis revealed that this combination therapy did not rely on traditional cannabinoid receptors or transient receptor potential cation channels, indicating that CBD exerts its anticancer effects through novel, noncanonical mechanisms. The findings suggest that the combination of CBD with etoposide could represent a groundbreaking approach to NSCLC treatment, particularly in cases where conventional therapies fail. By inducing autophagic cell death and inhibiting oncogenic pathways, this therapeutic strategy offers a promising new avenue for enhancing treatment efficacy in NSCLC, especially in tumors with p53 function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.