Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40307564›Full record

ArticleOecologia2025

Pollination efficiency of hummingbirds and flowerpiercers at the flowers of Lobelia laxiflora (Campanulaceae): morphological fit matters.

Stefan Abrahamczyk, Ruben Dürr, Emanuel Brenes, María A Maglianesi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oecologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stefan AbrahamczykBotanical Garden, University of Osnabrück, Albrechtstraße 29, 49076, Osnabrück, Germany. stefan.abrahamczyk@uni-osnabrueck.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8047-932X
Ruben DürrBotany Department, State Museum of Natural History Stuttgart, Rosenstein 1, 70191, Stuttgart, Germany.
Emanuel BrenesSchool of Agronomy, Costa Rica Institute of Technology (ITCR), San Carlos Campus, Alajuela, 223-21002, Costa Rica.
María A MaglianesiSchool of Agronomy, Costa Rica Institute of Technology (ITCR), San Carlos Campus, Alajuela, 223-21002, Costa Rica.

Funding

Consejo Nacional de Rectores FS-DFG-01-2024Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG: 522385752
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research on pollination systems has largely focused on structures of mutualistic networks, whereas pollinator efficiency defining the quality of visits received much less attention. Different flower-visiting animals can vary in their pollination efficiency, e.g. due to their morphology, size or visitation frequency. Here, we analyse several reproductive traits, including flower morphology and reproductive system of Lobelia laxiflora and compare pollination efficiency of flower visitors based on seed set. We found experimentally that Lobelia laxiflora is completely self-incompatible and that the flowers are frequently visited by Colibri cyanotus, which did not show preferences for one flower sex. Diglossa plumbea was a more rare visitor and concentrated on female flowers Diglossa forced their bills deeply into the dorsally open corolla tube but did not pierce flowers. Corolla tube length perfectly fitted bill length of Colibri cyanotus and lots of pollen was deposited on its heads. In contrast, Diglossa plumbea visited flowers by sitting in different positions to them. Therefore, the reproductive flower organs got in contact with different parts of its body. Consequently, Colibri cyanotus was a very efficient pollinator probably due to the high level of trait matching, whereas Diglossa plumbea was not pollinating at all. In conclusion, our study documents a rare case of a temporally limited one-to-one dependency of a plant and a hummingbird species on the population level. Additionally, it highlights the significant role of morphological trait matching and bird´s behaviour in flower handling for efficient pollination and demonstrates that non-adapted flower visitors may fail as pollinators.

Indexed as

BirdsFlowersLobeliaPollinationAnimalsReproductionColibriDiglossaNectar robbingSeed setSelf-incompatibility

Identifiers

PMID40307564
PMCPMC12043751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.