Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40307505›Full record

ReviewCurrent psychiatry reports2025

Expansion of Colleges' Legal Responsibilities Regarding Student Mental Health.

Stephanie A Rolin, Paul S Appelbaum

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current psychiatry reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Stephanie A RolinDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Clinical Psychiatry in the Center for Law, Ethics & Psychiatry, New York, USA.
Paul S AppelbaumCenter for Law, Ethics & Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center and New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1051 Riverside Drive, New York, NY, 10032, USA. psa21@columbia.edu.

Funding

YOUNG ADULTS WITH VIOLENT BEHAVIOR DURING EARLY PSYCHOSIS: A MIXED-METHODS ASSESSMENT AND INTERVENTION TRIALK23MH126312 · NIMH · HOWARD UNIVERSITY · PI ROLIN, STEPHANIE · 2021 to 2025
$1.0M
NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH126312
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of the reviewWe review recently published literature about the mental health of college students, as well as current court cases litigating colleges' liability for student mental health and safety. RECENT

findingsCollege students experienced a dramatic increase in mental health symptoms during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, with clinically significant increases in anxiety and depression. Meanwhile, in contrast to the past when colleges were mostly immune to liability for harm to students, a major shift occurred with the courts beginning to recognize colleges as having a legally defined "special relationship" to protect students from foreseeable harm. Recently, court cases in many states have expanded the circumstances under which colleges have a responsibility to protect students from themselves and from each other, and to foster students' mental health. The past few years have constituted a changing landscape for colleges with regard to their legal responsibilities related to student mental health. As college students experienced worsening mental health distress, recent court cases increased colleges' liability to ensure safety and create a supportive environment for students' mental health.

Indexed as

COVID-19Liability, LegalMental HealthStudentsHumansUniversitiesCollege mental healthCollege/university liabilityDuty to protectSpecial relationship

Identifiers

PMID40307505
PMCPMC12278051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.