ArticleHistochemistry and cell biology2025
The effects of benzimidazole and electrical stimulation on peripheral nerve regeneration after short- and long-term injury.
Article in Histochemistry and cell biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This research investigated the effects of benzimidazole (BZ) and electrical stimulation (ES) on peripheral nerve regeneration after short- and long-term injury and assessed functional recovery by means of stereological, histological, and electrophysiological analyses. Fifty-four male albino Wistar rats were divided into nine groups of six animals each. No treatment or surgery was applied to the control (CONT) group. The sciatic nerve was crushed for 5 s in the short-term injury (STI) and for 60 s in the long-term injury (LTI) groups. In the STI + BZ group and the LTI + BZ group, the rats received 25 mg/kg/day of BZ via oral gavage for 28 days. In the STI + ES and LTI + ES groups, a 3-V current was applied for 20 min daily for 28 days. In the STI + BZ + ES group and the LTI + BZ + ES groups, 3-V ES was applied for 20 min per day for 28 days following oral administration of BZ at 25 mg/kg/day for 28 days. All groups were subjected to electrophysiological, electron microscopic, stereological, and statistical analyses. The stereological analyses revealed a significant increases in the numbers of myelinated axons in the STI + ES groups compared with the STI (p < 0.01). BZ treatment yielded no significant differences in the numbers of myelinated axons in the groups (p > 0.05). Histological evaluation of the STI and LTI groups showed that ES and BZ treatment positively affect the histological structure of the nerve.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.