ArticleScientific reports2025
A brain tumor segmentation method based on attention mechanism.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An Efficient and Cohesive System for Enhanced Accuracy in Malignant Brain Tumor Diagnosis.Current medical imaging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rise in brain tumor incidence due to the global population aging has intensified the need for precise segmentation methods in clinical settings. Current segmentation networks often fail to capture comprehensive contextual information and fine edge details of brain tumors, which are crucial for accurate diagnosis and treatment. To address these challenges, we introduce BSAU-Net, a novel segmentation algorithm that employs attention mechanisms and edge feature extraction modules to enhance performance. Our approach aims to assist clinicians in making more accurate diagnostic and therapeutic decisions. BSAU-Net incorporates an edge feature extraction module (EA) based on the Sobel operator, enhancing the model's sensitivity to tumor regions while preserving edge contours. Additionally, a spatial attention module (SPA) is introduced to establish global feature correlations, critical for accurate tumor segmentation. To address class imbalance, which can hinder performance, we propose BADLoss, a loss function tailored to mitigate this issue. Experimental results on the BraTS2018 and BraTS2021 datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of BSAU-Net, achieving average Dice coefficients of 0.7506 and 0.7556, PPV of 0.7863 and 0.7843, sensitivity of 0.8998 and 0.9017, and HD95 of 2.1701 and 2.1543, respectively. These results highlight BSAU-Net's potential to significantly improve brain tumor segmentation in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.