Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40307456›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Evaluation of deliverable artificial intelligence-based automated volumetric arc radiation therapy planning for whole pelvic radiation in gynecologic cancer.

Yushan Xiao, Shohei Tanaka, Noriyuki Kadoya, Kiyokazu Sato, Yuto Kimura, Rei Umezawa, Yoshiyuki Katsuta, Kazuhiro Arai, Haruna Takahashi, Taichi Hoshino and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yushan Xiao *Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8574, Japan.
Shohei Tanaka *Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8574, Japan.
Noriyuki KadoyaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8574, Japan. kadoya.n@rad.med.tohoku.ac.jp.
Kiyokazu SatoRadiation Technology, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan.
Yuto KimuraRadiation Oncology Center, Ofuna Chuo Hospital, Kamakura, Japan.
Rei UmezawaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8574, Japan.
Yoshiyuki KatsutaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8574, Japan.
Kazuhiro AraiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8574, Japan.
Haruna TakahashiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8574, Japan.
Taichi HoshinoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8574, Japan.
Keiichi JinguDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8574, Japan.

Funding

JST SPRING JPMJSP2114
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to develop a deep learning (DL)-based deliverable whole pelvic volumetric arc radiation therapy (VMAT) for patients with gynecologic cancer using a prototype DL-based automated planning support system, named RatoGuide, to evaluate its clinical validity. In our hospital, 110 patients with gynecologic cancer were registered. The prescribed dose was 50.4 Gy/28 fr. A DL-based three-dimensional dose prediction model was first trained by the dose distribution and structure data of whole pelvic VMAT (n = 100) created on the Monaco treatment planning system (TPS). The structure data of the test data (n = 10) were then input to RatoGuide, and RatoGuide predicted the dose distribution of the whole pelvic VMAT plan (PreDose). We established deliverable plans with Monaco and Eclipse TPS (DeliDose) based on PreDose and vendor-supplied optimization objectives. Medical physicists then manually developed plans (CliDose) for the test data. Finally, we evaluated and compared the dose distribution and dose constraints of PreDose, DeliDose, and CliDose. DeliDose, in both Eclipse and Monaco, was comparable to PreDose in most Dose constraints, planning target volume (PTV) coverage, and Dmax of the bladder, rectum, and bowel bag were better for DeliDose than for PreDose. Additionally, DeliDose demonstrated no significant difference from CliDose in most dose constraints. The blinded average scores of radiation oncologists for DeliDose and CliDose were 4.2 ± 0.4 and 4.3 ± 0.5, respectively, in Eclipse, and 4.0 ± 0.6 and 3.9 ± 0.5, respectively, in Monaco (5 is the max score and 3 is clinically acceptable). We indicated that RatoGuide can eliminate variations in plan quality between hospitals in whole pelvic VMAT irradiation and help develop VMAT plans in a short time.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceGenital Neoplasms, FemalePelvisRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedDeep LearningFemaleHumansOrgans at RiskRadiotherapy DosageDeep learningDeep learning based deliverable planGynecologic cancer dose predictionWhole pelvic radiation therapy

Identifiers

PMID40307456
PMCPMC12043927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.