ArticleNature biomedical engineering2025
A live bacteria enzyme assay for identification of human disease mutations and drug screening.
Article in Nature biomedical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evidence for G6PD variant classification from multiplexed functional assays.Genome biology · 2026Article
- Evidence forbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advances in high-throughput sequencing have enabled the identification of genetic variations associated with human disease. However, deciphering the functional significance of these variations remains challenging. Here we propose an alternative approach that uses humanized Escherichia coli to study human genetic enzymopathies and to screen candidate drug effects on metabolic targets. By replacing selected E. coli metabolic enzymes with their human orthologues and their sequence variants, we demonstrate that the growth rate of E. coli reflects the in vivo activity of heterologously expressed human enzymes. This approach accurately reflected enzyme activities of known sequence variants, enabling rapid screening of causal sequence variations associated with human diseases. This approach bridges the gap between in vitro assays and cell-based assays. Our findings suggest that the proposed approach using a humanized E. coli strain holds promise for drug discovery, offering a high-throughput and cost-effective platform for identifying new compounds targeting human enzymes. Continued research and innovation in this field have the potential to impact the development and practice of precision medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.