ArticleScientific reports2025
A novel method for isolation of tumor infiltrating myeloid-derived suppressor cells from human lung tumor tissue.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Colorectal cancer stem cells crosstalk in tumor immune microenvironment and targeted therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The tumor microenvironment comprises different cell subsets including myeloid-derived suppressor cells, which exert intratumoral immunosuppression and favor cancer progression. Isolating tumor-infiltrating myeloid-derived suppressor cells (tMDSCs) from human tumor samples remains a challenge. Current methods such as magnetic bead sorting (MACS) or flow cytometry sorting (FACS) present some drawbacks in terms of purity and viability. Here, we have setup an innovative workflow that combines RosetteSep technology and MACS for isolation of tMDSCs from lung cancer biopsies. To evaluate our Rosette-MACS approach, we compared its performance with MACS and FACS. The isolated cells were characterized by flow cytometry, gene expression analysis and proliferation assays for comparison purposes. The results showed that the Rosette-MACS protocol had the highest yield and purity of tMDSCs (79.64% vs 13.30% with FACS and 0.39% with MACS). Furthermore, the functionality of the isolated tMDSCs was tested not only by upregulation of immunosuppressive genes (e.g. ARG1, IDO1, or PD-L1), but also by their capacity to inhibit CD8
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.