Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40307361›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

IoT driven healthcare monitoring with evolutionary optimization and game theory.

Shitharth Selvarajan, Hariprasath Manoharan, Taher Al-Shehari, Nasser A Alsadhan, Subav Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shitharth SelvarajanDepartment of Computer Science, Kebri Dehar University, 250, Kebri Dehar, Ethiopia. shitharths@kdu.edu.et.
Hariprasath ManoharanDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Panimalar Engineering College, Poonamallee, Chennai, India.
Taher Al-ShehariComputer Skills, Department of Self-Development Skill, Common First Year Deanship, King Saud University, 11362, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Nasser A AlsadhanComputer Science Department, College of Computer and Information Sciences, King Saud University, 12372, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Subav SinghChitkara Centre for Research and Development, Chitkara University, Baddi, Himachal Pradesh, 174103, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper the game theory procedures are applied for healthcare monitoring systems and it is analysed using two types of evolutionary algorithms that incorporate Artificial Intelligence (AI) based events. As most of the existing approaches face challenges in establishing real-time connectivity, optimizing decision-making processes, and minimizing latency in Internet of Things (IoT)-based healthcare applications the limitations needs to be addressed. Hence with analytical equivalences that are crucial in game theory, a unique system model is developed using a deterministic framework where four key performers are strategically connected to improve decision-making and security against potential data breaches. By incorporating two evolutionary algorithms, the proposed approach optimizes the state of action for each participant while reducing energy consumption and processing delay. The model is validated through four case studies, demonstrating an average improvement of 60% over existing methodologies. These findings highlight the effectiveness of integrating game theory with evolutionary optimization to enhance real-time healthcare monitoring.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareGame TheoryInternet of ThingsAlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceHumansMonitoring, PhysiologicEvolutionary algorithmsGame theoryHealth careInternet of things (IoT)

Identifiers

PMID40307361
PMCPMC12043961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.