ArticleScientific reports2025
Formation permeability estimation using mud loss data by deep learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Physics-informed multi-task learning for permeability prediction and probabilistic HFU modeling: a case study from the Lower Bahariya Reservoir, Shahd SE field Egypt.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Research on risk assessment method of wireline logging sticking and analysis of sensitive factors.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Assessing proxy and AI models performance in waterflooding optimization.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Permeability estimation plays an essential role in the assessment of reservoirs and hydrocarbon extraction. There are various methods to evaluate the formation and estimate the formation permeability, but in some cases, the evaluation may not be done or it may not be done correctly. This study focuses on a novel method to estimate the formation's permeability with appropriate accuracy using the mud loss data. Machine learning applications are becoming more popular nowadays and can succeed in many fields. This current research focuses on the application of mud loss data and deep learning to estimate the formation's permeability. To implement and validate our methodology, it is considered pilot cases including reservoir and drilling parameters values (depth, formation type, formation thickness, mud density, mud viscosity, and formation permeability). It is assumed that mud loss was occurred because of deferential pressure between formation pressure and bottom-hole pressure. The mud loss rate data were generated at different sets of reservoir and drilling data values using a reservoir simulator and then evaluated by calculating the correlation coefficients to ensure their validity and to check the fit under real conditions. This can be used to estimate the formation permeability values. One-dimensional convolutional neural networks(1D-CNN), a type of convolutional neural network, is utilized to be trained with data to perform a regression problem based on the contribution of flattening, dropout, and fully connected layers to estimate permeability with high accuracy (training data R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.